1967
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2496(67)90050-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foundations of stimulus-sampling theory for continuous-time processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A feature common to these models assuming maximizing is an emphasis on steady-state behavior. One of the most challenging problems is to relate such models to others that attempt to describe behavior in transition (e.g., see Norman, 1966;Suppes &Donio, 1967).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A feature common to these models assuming maximizing is an emphasis on steady-state behavior. One of the most challenging problems is to relate such models to others that attempt to describe behavior in transition (e.g., see Norman, 1966;Suppes &Donio, 1967).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 1955 and 1970, Suppes collaborated with W. K. Estes, R. C. Atkinson, and others in formalizing mathematical learning theory, especially in the guise of stimulus sampling theory, in terms of a collection of stochastic processes of the Markovian type (Estes & Suppes, 1959, 1974Suppes & Atkinson, 1960). In simple learning situations, these Markov models were successful in representing the data, and this approach was generally regarded as notable progress over the informal learning theories proposed by Clark Hull, Edward Tolman, and others, whose ambiguous predictions led to controversies.…”
Section: Mathematical Learning Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d) Stimulus Sampling Theory for Continuous-Time Processes: Extension to a continuum of responses. (Suppes and Donio 1967).…”
Section: At Asymptotementioning
confidence: 99%