Four Decades of Military Posttraumatic Stress: Protocol for a Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Treatment Approaches and Efficacy

Abstract

Background Over 85% of active members of the Canadian Armed Forces have been exposed to potentially traumatic events linked to the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). At the time of transition to civilian life, as high as 1 in 8 veterans may be diagnosed with PTSD. Given the high prevalence of PTSD in military and veteran populations, the provision of effective treatment considering their unique challenges and experiences is critical for mental health support and the well-being of these populations. Objective This paper presents the protocol for a meta-analysis and systematic review that will examine the effectiveness of treatment approaches for military-related PTSD. Methods This PROSPERO-preregistered meta-analysis is being conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and Cochrane guidelines. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using the databases PsycInfo, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertation & Theses. Effect sizes will be computed based on changes in PTSD symptom scores over time across studies using validated PTSD scales. A multilevel meta-analysis will examine the overall effects, between-study effects, and within-study effects of available evidence for PTSD treatments in military populations. Effect sizes will be compared between pharmacotherapeutic, psychotherapeutic, and alternative/emerging treatment interventions. Finally, meta-regression and subgroup analyses will explore the moderating roles of clinical characteristics (eg, PTSD symptom clusters), treatment approaches (eg, therapeutic orientations in psychotherapy and alternative therapies and classifications of drugs in pharmacotherapy), as well as treatment characteristics (eg, length of intervention) on treatment outcomes. Results The literature search was completed on April 14, 2021. After the removal of duplicates, a total of 12,002 studies were screened for inclusion. As of July 2021, title and abstract screening has been completed, with 1469 out of 12,002 (12.23%) studies included for full-text review. Full review is expected to be completed in the summer of 2021, with initial results expected for publication by early winter of 2021. Conclusions This meta-analysis will provide information on the current state of evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of various treatment approaches for military-related PTSD and identify factors that may influence treatment outcomes. The results will inform clinical decision-making for service providers and service users. Finally, the findings will provide insights into future treatment development and practice recommendations to better support the well-being of military and veteran populations. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42021245754; https://tinyurl.com/y9u57c59 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/33151

The Effect of Group Psychotherapy on the Mental Health of Servicemen with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

“…The opinion on the differentiation of approaches to working with PTSD by civilians and military is significant (Liu et al, 2021). Optimizing group psychotherapy also involves preliminary individual work with the patient, which is of a preparatory nature (Kokun et al, 2017).…”

“…This is especially true of traumatic memories of an event (Levi et al, 2022). At the same time, cognitive therapy and pharmacological intervention demonstrate greater effectiveness in the treatment of anxiety disorders (Springer et al, 2018) and depression (Thimm & Antonsen, 2014) treating PTSD in servicemen differ from those in the civilian population (Liu et al, 2021). In particular, trauma-focused therapy, despite its proven effectiveness, has shown better results in working with non-military citizens (Coventry et al, 2020).…”

Ketamine in the effective management of chronic pain, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder for Veterans: A meta-analysis and systematic review

“…For this review, SWIFT-Active Screener, a web-based, collaborative review software was used for screening purposes (14, 15 Preprint). A similar protocol was followed by Liu et al (16) in a meta-analysis and systematic review of treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder. The protocol of the current meta-analysis has been pre-registered at PROSPERO CRD42022339015 (17).…”

“…A similar protocol was followed by Liu et al. ( 16 ) in a meta-analysis and systematic review of treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder. The protocol of the current meta-analysis has been pre-registered at PROSPERO CRD42022339015 ( 17 ).…”

New Diagnosis and Treatment Approaches to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

“…Neuro-modulatory treatments are viable treatment options for many psychiatric disorders. After U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as an option for treating depression, researchers also tried to use repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depressive symptoms of PTSD [62]. rTMS and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are frequently employed as adjunctive options to pharmacotherapy for the treatment of several psychiatric disorders including PTSD.…”