Four decades of negative word‐of‐mouth and negative electronic word‐of‐mouth: A morphological analysis

Abstract

Customers voice their negative brand experiences to their family and friends in the form of negative word‐of‐mouth (NWOM). Web 2.0 enables the sharing of NWOM in electronic format on various social media sites, online customer review forums, and blogs, which is known as negative electronic word‐of‐mouth (NeWOM). Researchers need to study the spread of NWOM/NeWOM to prevent adverse consequences for companies and suggest an optimal response for its redressal. Existing literature review studies have focused on word‐of‐mouth (WOM) and electronic WOM (eWOM) and have considered both positive and negative WOM and eWOM concurrently. Past literature reviews have captured the breadth of the WOM domain, ignoring the depth. This research article contains a review of 282 journal papers capturing the depth of the extant literature by focusing solely on ‘negative’ WOM and eWOM (NWOM and NeWOM), and presents a broad view of the NWOM and NeWOM domains using morphological analysis (MA). This will help to conceptualize and categorize the existing state‐of‐the‐art literature into broad dimensions and identify future research opportunities. The MA framework helps to bifurcate this literature into the following four dimensions: (i) nomenclature of NWOM and NeWOM, (ii) antecedents of NWOM/NeWOM, (iii) impacts of NWOM/NeWOM, and (iv) prevention and recovery response to NeWOM. Further dissection of these four dimensions leads to 15 sub‐dimensions and 217 variants. Combinations of the 217 variants enable the identification of 550 novel future research opportunities in the area of NWOM and NeWOM.

The relationship between electronic word of mouth and brand: A systematic review and future research agenda

“…They have performed a meta‐analysis and using two‐stage structural equation model found that message characteristics (perceived informativeness, message quality), and source characteristics (source trustworthiness and source expertise) had a profound impact on eWOM adoption. On the similar lines, Ribeiro and Kalro (2023) conducted a review on negative eWOM using morphological analysis. The review mentioned areas which impact negative eWOM like receiver and sender characteristics, brand, and so forth.…”