2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four KPIs for the assessment of biofouling effect on ship performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ISO 19030 ISO (2016) along with several researchers (Koboević et al (2019); Coraddu et al (2019)) recommends observing the horizontal shift (along the speed axis) of the calm-water speed-power curve, termed as the speed-loss, over time to monitor the performance of a sea-going ship using the in-service data. Alternatively, it is suggested to observe the vertical shift of the calm-water speed-power curve, often termed as the change in power demand (adopted by Gupta et al (2021a) and Carchen and Atlar (2020)). Some researchers also formulated and used some indirect performance indicators like fuel consumption (Koboević et al (2019)), resistance (or fouling) coefficient (Munk (2016); Foteinos et al (2017); Carchen and Atlar (2020)), (generalized) admiralty coefficient (Ejdfors (2019); Gupta et al (2021b)), wake fraction (Carchen and Atlar (2020)), fuel efficiency (Kim et al (2021)), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ISO 19030 ISO (2016) along with several researchers (Koboević et al (2019); Coraddu et al (2019)) recommends observing the horizontal shift (along the speed axis) of the calm-water speed-power curve, termed as the speed-loss, over time to monitor the performance of a sea-going ship using the in-service data. Alternatively, it is suggested to observe the vertical shift of the calm-water speed-power curve, often termed as the change in power demand (adopted by Gupta et al (2021a) and Carchen and Atlar (2020)). Some researchers also formulated and used some indirect performance indicators like fuel consumption (Koboević et al (2019)), resistance (or fouling) coefficient (Munk (2016); Foteinos et al (2017); Carchen and Atlar (2020)), (generalized) admiralty coefficient (Ejdfors (2019); Gupta et al (2021b)), wake fraction (Carchen and Atlar (2020)), fuel efficiency (Kim et al (2021)), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, it is suggested to observe the vertical shift of the calm-water speed-power curve, often termed as the change in power demand (adopted by Gupta et al (2021a) and Carchen and Atlar (2020)). Some researchers also formulated and used some indirect performance indicators like fuel consumption (Koboević et al (2019)), resistance (or fouling) coefficient (Munk (2016); Foteinos et al (2017); Carchen and Atlar (2020)), (generalized) admiralty coefficient (Ejdfors (2019); Gupta et al (2021b)), wake fraction (Carchen and Atlar (2020)), fuel efficiency (Kim et al (2021)), etc. In each of these cases, it is clearly seen (and most of the time acknowledged) that the results are quite sensitive to the quality of the data used to estimate the ship's performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%