2015
DOI: 10.4172/2169-0316.1000178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four Layers Approach for Developing System Thinking Assessment Tool for Industrial and Systems Engineers

Abstract: Purpose: This paper deals with four layers approach for developing a tool for assessing engineering systems thinking. Every engineer and, in particular, industrial and systems engineer needs a systems view that enable to perform systems engineering tasks successfully. The paper's purpose is to present a tool for assessing systems thinking of industrial and systems engineers. The tool may be used for industrial and systems engineering workplace selection and development, developing industrial and systems engine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frank and Kordova (2015) describe a four‐layer method to construct a tool for the evaluation of engineering ST. They believe that every engineer, particularly industrial and systems engineers, needs a systems perspective to properly conduct systems engineering duties.…”
Section: Literature Review and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Frank and Kordova (2015) describe a four‐layer method to construct a tool for the evaluation of engineering ST. They believe that every engineer, particularly industrial and systems engineers, needs a systems perspective to properly conduct systems engineering duties.…”
Section: Literature Review and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They believe that every engineer, particularly industrial and systems engineers, needs a systems perspective to properly conduct systems engineering duties. This study aims to propose a technique for grading industrial and systems engineers' ST (Frank & Kordova, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Review and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%