Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004. 2004
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2004.1334263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four metrics for efficiently comparing attributed trees

Abstract: We address the problem of comparing attributed trees and propose four novel distance metrics centered around the notion of a maximal similarity common subtree, and hence can be computed in polynomial time. We experimentally validate the usefulness of our metrics on shape matching tasks, and compare them with edit-distance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method uses the size of MCS between two trees, or metrics defined by MCS as the similarity measure. In (Torsello, Hidovic & Pelillo 2004), four novel distance measures for attributed trees based on the notion of a maximum similarity sub-tree isomorphism were proposed. In (Lin et al 2008), the number of all common embedded sub-trees between two trees was used as the measure of similarity.…”
Section: Tree Similarity Measure Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method uses the size of MCS between two trees, or metrics defined by MCS as the similarity measure. In (Torsello, Hidovic & Pelillo 2004), four novel distance measures for attributed trees based on the notion of a maximum similarity sub-tree isomorphism were proposed. In (Lin et al 2008), the number of all common embedded sub-trees between two trees was used as the measure of similarity.…”
Section: Tree Similarity Measure Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several tree estimation algorithms, like the minimum editing distance 23 or four metrics, 24 which are quite effective and can be used to determine whether two objects are different or not. However, each node in those binary trees, illustrated in previous subsection, is a global statistical value.…”
Section: Hu's Moment Invariants Of Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid this size bias effect, we weight W (ϕ 12 ) relative to the original tree sizes. For this purpose we apply the four metrics proposed in [23], with |V i | the number of vertices in V i :…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%