In this work, we first synthesized a Zn−Dy complex, [Zn 6 Dy 2 (L) 6 (tea) 2 (CH 3 OH) 2 ]•6CH 3 OH•8H 2 O (H 2 L = N-3methoxysalicylidene-2-amino-3-hydroxypyridine, teaH 3 = triethanolamine, 1), by employing H 2 L, anhydrous ZnCl 2 , and Dy(NO 3 ) 3 • 5H 2 O reacting with auxiliary ligand teaH 3 in the mixture of CH 3 OH and DMF. When teaH 3 and the solvent CH 3 OH in the reaction system of 1 were replaced by the auxiliary ligand 2,6-pyridinedimethanol (pdmH 2 ) and the solvent MeCN, another Zn−Dy complex, [Zn 4 Dy 4 (L) 6 (pdm) 2 (pdmH) 4 ]•10CH 3 CN•5H 2 O ( 2), was obtained. For 1, its crystal structure can be viewed as a dimer of two Zn 3 Dy III units. However, for 2, four Dy III form a zigzag arrangement, and each of its terminals linked two Zn II ions. Interestingly, although the structural topologies of 1 and 2 are different, the coordination geometries of Dy III in 1 and 2 are all triangular dodecahedron (TDD-8). The difference is that the continuous shape measure (CShM) values of Dy III in 1 are larger than the corresponding values in 2. Magnetic investigation revealed that the diluted sample 1@Y exhibits two magnetic relaxation processes, while 2 only exhibits a single relaxation process. Ab initio calculations indicated that, in the crystal lattice of 1, two complexes exhibiting slightly different CShM values of Dy III result in the double relaxation behavior of