1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0723-2020(99)80070-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four New Species in Lipomyces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, four distinct clusters of reassociation strains of L. starkeyi were identified, i.e., L. starkeyi sensu stricto and L. starkeyi clusters a, b, and c. Van der Walt et al (1997) examined the possibility of genetic exchange by prototrophic selection techniques, and suggested that L. starkeyi cluster a should be designated as a distinct species called L. mesembrius. Lipomyces starkeyi clusters b and c were treated as distinct species, L. doorenjongii and L. kockii, respectively (Van der Walt et al 1999). Phylogenetic analysis of partial 5.8S rRNA and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 2 sequences showed that L. starkeyi s.s. and its associated clusters b and c, and L. mesembrius formed a monophyletic group with L. tetrasporus (Gouliamova et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, four distinct clusters of reassociation strains of L. starkeyi were identified, i.e., L. starkeyi sensu stricto and L. starkeyi clusters a, b, and c. Van der Walt et al (1997) examined the possibility of genetic exchange by prototrophic selection techniques, and suggested that L. starkeyi cluster a should be designated as a distinct species called L. mesembrius. Lipomyces starkeyi clusters b and c were treated as distinct species, L. doorenjongii and L. kockii, respectively (Van der Walt et al 1999). Phylogenetic analysis of partial 5.8S rRNA and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 2 sequences showed that L. starkeyi s.s. and its associated clusters b and c, and L. mesembrius formed a monophyletic group with L. tetrasporus (Gouliamova et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three of the groups were composed of subgroups that showed 47–69% DNA relatedness. Van der Walt et al (1997, 1999) suggested that the six well‐isolated groups, as well as the subgroups, represented individual species, resulting in the description of five new species and the elevation of a subspecies to species status. The 11 species accepted in these studies were the following: Lipomyces doorenjongii, L .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, taxonomic criteria such as the sequence of the D1/D2 domain of the large-subunit (LSU) rRNA gene, ascospore morphology and assimilation profiles could not clearly indicate differences between these species (Smith & Kurtzman, 2011). However, most Lipomyces species, including L. yarrowii, L. yamadae, L. spencermartinsiae, L. kockii, L. doorenjongii and L. mesembrius, were shown to be independent species according to the results of DNA hybridization (Smith et al, 1995;van der Walt et al, 1997van der Walt et al, , 1999. Kurtzman et al (2007) conducted a reclassification of the family Lipomycetaceae by using four genes, namely the small-subunit (SSU) rRNA gene, the mitochondrial small-subunit (MtSSU) rRNA gene, the LSU rRNA gene and the translation elongation factor 1 alpha .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%