2013
DOI: 10.1021/cg301639r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four Polymorphs of Methyl Paraben: Structural Relationships and Relative Energy Differences

Abstract: Four polymorphic forms of methyl paraben (methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate, 1), denoted 1-I (melting point 126 °C), 1-III (109 °C), 1-107 (107 °C), and 1-112 (112 °C), have been investigated by thermomicroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, and X-ray crystallography. The crystal structures of the metastable forms 1-III, 1-107, and 1-112 have been determined. All polymorphs contain the same O–H···O=C connected catemer motif, but the geometry of the resulting H-bonded chain is different in each form. The Z′ = 3 structure of 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
6
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If there is a large spread in densities, free-energy calculations are likely to rerank structures that are close in lattice energy, whereas if there are significant differences in conformation and types of hydrogen bonding then it is more effective to assess the sensitivity to different approaches of lattice energy calculation and quality of wavefunction. It can be desirable to contrast a range of different electronic structure based methods of calculating lattice energies (Gelbrich et al, 2013;. If the aim is to interpret the experimental evidence for additional polymorphs or forms of disorder, then comparisons of calculated spectra or diffractograms and the link between the structures and observed transformations may give a very strong indication of the type of structure responsible.…”
Section: Because the Polymorphs Are Not Detected Or Structurally Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is a large spread in densities, free-energy calculations are likely to rerank structures that are close in lattice energy, whereas if there are significant differences in conformation and types of hydrogen bonding then it is more effective to assess the sensitivity to different approaches of lattice energy calculation and quality of wavefunction. It can be desirable to contrast a range of different electronic structure based methods of calculating lattice energies (Gelbrich et al, 2013;. If the aim is to interpret the experimental evidence for additional polymorphs or forms of disorder, then comparisons of calculated spectra or diffractograms and the link between the structures and observed transformations may give a very strong indication of the type of structure responsible.…”
Section: Because the Polymorphs Are Not Detected Or Structurally Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymorph II was finally reported and confirmed in 2011 [81], followed by the discovery more MP polymorphs. Four polymorphs of MP were characterized and compared in 2013, showing distinct crystal structures and lattice energy [82]. Other parabens are less polymorphic, till now only one polymorph was reported for EP, PP and BP [49,73,83].…”
Section: Crystal Structures and Polymorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The codes have also been used separately, e.g. Gelbrich et al [44] report a recent application of CrystalOptimizer to the study of four polymorphs of methyl paraben.…”
Section: The Crystalpredictor and Crystaloptimizer Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%