2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp00814a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four resonance structures elucidate double-bond isomerisation of a biological chromophore

Abstract: Four resonance structures determining the electronic structure of the chromophore’s ground and first excited states. Changing the relative energies of the structures by hydrogen-bonding interactions tunes all chromophore’s photochemical properties.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PYP S photocycle kinetics are in agreement with earlier spectroscopic reports 19,[23][24][25]27,28,35,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] , while the PYP C results closely follow those observed in TRC by Schotte 2 , Jung 3 and Ten Boer et al 11 (Note that these latter three studies mutually agree on the data, but differ in the bond-order of the double bond that can isomerize in the chromophore, due the use of DFT optimized structure vs non-DFT optimized structures 46 . In a recent ab initio computational study, the former structure was favored 47 ). The agreement between the current data and those of TRC includes the dynamics on the 18 ns timescale associated with formation of pR 2 , 100% yield of pR 2 from pR 0 2 and the 22% overall pR yield 11 , though the former reported the pR 2 to pB transition to take place in 410 ms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PYP S photocycle kinetics are in agreement with earlier spectroscopic reports 19,[23][24][25]27,28,35,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] , while the PYP C results closely follow those observed in TRC by Schotte 2 , Jung 3 and Ten Boer et al 11 (Note that these latter three studies mutually agree on the data, but differ in the bond-order of the double bond that can isomerize in the chromophore, due the use of DFT optimized structure vs non-DFT optimized structures 46 . In a recent ab initio computational study, the former structure was favored 47 ). The agreement between the current data and those of TRC includes the dynamics on the 18 ns timescale associated with formation of pR 2 , 100% yield of pR 2 from pR 0 2 and the 22% overall pR yield 11 , though the former reported the pR 2 to pB transition to take place in 410 ms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LE form has been proposed as a diradicaloid structure at the methine bridge according to Olsen’s computational study . It has likewise been introduced in the context of retinal and other polyene chromophores as the 2A g state (as opposed to the 1B u state with a dominant charge-transfer character). While for the neutral all- trans polyene, the diradicaloid state is indeed lower in energy than the charge-separated state, the former tends to have a small oscillator strength when excited from the ground state (1A g for all- trans polyenes) due to the unfavorable parity . The assignment of the diradicaloid behavior seems to be in contradiction to the large extinction coefficients for the protonated GFP chromophore observed from experiments and calculations, ,, where the S 0 –S 1 transition is consistently designated to be of π–π* character.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All electronic configurations were generated from five reference configurations [the closed-shell, two single (HOMO-1 to LUMO and HOMO to LUMO) and two double (HOMO-1 to LUMO and HOMO to LUMO) excitations]. The active space (16,12) was employed which distributes 16 electrons in 12 orbitals: six π orbitals, two n orbitals and four π* orbitals. The state minima (S0_min and S1_min) and minimum-energy S0/S1 conical intersection (CI) geometries were optimized.…”
Section: Electronic Structure Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10] Owing to their importance, phytochromes have been extensively studied over decades. 9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The biological functions of phytochrome are controlled by the switching between two forms (Pr and Pfr). 19 The physiologically inactive Pr form can absorb red light, and converts to the active Pfr form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%