1995
DOI: 10.2307/3034688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four Types of Symbolic Conflict

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
49
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In many stable polities, symbolic issues are often regarded as just that: symbolic, peripheral to the political core, and capable of offering a metaphor for wider political or social developments. In a deeply divided society, heightened sensitivity to cultural and identity issues may mean that symbols are drawn into the political core and become credited with an absolute worth (Firth, 1973, p. 427; see also Harrison, 1995). The very fact that certain groups may hold certain types of art or imagery, certain days or certain locations in high esteem, may in turn make these symbolic targets for opposing groups or individuals.…”
Section: Violence In Ethno-national Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many stable polities, symbolic issues are often regarded as just that: symbolic, peripheral to the political core, and capable of offering a metaphor for wider political or social developments. In a deeply divided society, heightened sensitivity to cultural and identity issues may mean that symbols are drawn into the political core and become credited with an absolute worth (Firth, 1973, p. 427; see also Harrison, 1995). The very fact that certain groups may hold certain types of art or imagery, certain days or certain locations in high esteem, may in turn make these symbolic targets for opposing groups or individuals.…”
Section: Violence In Ethno-national Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objectively disproportionate investment of time, money, and resources in monuments can be understood as conflicts over the accumulation, capture, and use of symbolic capital by political elites. Bourdieu (1977Bourdieu ( , 1990 introduced the concept of symbolic capital in his analysis of social relationships in pre-capitalist, agrarian societies, although the idea has subsequently been applied more broadly to political conflicts and the built environment (Dovey 1992, Harrison 1995, McCann 1995 Officialization is the process whereby the group (or those who dominate it) teaches itself and masks from itself its own truth, binds itself by a public profession which sanctions and imposes what it utters…[and contributes] to the maintenance of the social order from which it derives its power (Bourdieu 1990, 108).…”
Section: National Identity and Symbolic Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Il caso della Fgci modenese, allora, non è solo interpretabile nel contesto del passaggio da propaganda a comunicazione politica che molti partiti avevano intrapreso all'inizio degli anni Ottanta, ma può essere considerato anche come un esempio di innovazione simbolica, un processo tipico dei periodi di trasformazione delle culture politiche [Harrison 1995]. La scelta di mescolare repertori simbolici differenti e, di conseguenza, rimodulare l'identità politica comunista con l'introduzione di nuove istanze e obiettivi, era una risposta alla crisi generale del comunismo italiano che di fatto precedeva il dibattito che avrebbe poi accompagnato la svolta occhettiana dell'1989-1991.…”
Section: Prime Conclusioni E Prospettive DI Interpretazioneunclassified