2003
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200305230-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four-year behavioral outcomes of an intervention for parents living with HIV and their adolescent children

Abstract: Ongoing support and skills are needed to maintain intervention effects over longer periods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In counseling for parents with AIDS/HIV and their adolescent children, 103,97 although both groups profited in various domains, positive effects seemed to last for the first two years, primarily for the program's duration. At six years 104 there were still positive effects in the intervention group, although only evident in secondary outcomes.…”
Section: Related Evaluation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In counseling for parents with AIDS/HIV and their adolescent children, 103,97 although both groups profited in various domains, positive effects seemed to last for the first two years, primarily for the program's duration. At six years 104 there were still positive effects in the intervention group, although only evident in secondary outcomes.…”
Section: Related Evaluation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were significant benefits for the families over 4 years. [15][16][17] Parents decreased their emotional distress and problem behaviors over 2 years, and they were also less likely to relapse into substance abuse or to be drug dependent over 4 years. Their adolescent children reported less emotional distress and fewer problem behaviors over 2 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors calculated the subscales into two types of coping as ''problem-focussed coping'' and ''emotional-focussed coping''. The other coping measurement tools identified in studies through this review were ''Dealing with Illness Inventory'' (Comulada, Swendeman, Rotheram-Borus, Mattes, & Weiss, 2003;, ''Coping Self-efficacy'' (Chesney, Chambers, Taylor, Johnson, & Folkman, 2003;, ''Coping with Illness Questionnaire'' (Rotheram-Borus, Lee, Gwadz, & Draimin, 2001;Rotheram-Borus et al, 2003), ''Jalowiec Coping Scale (JCS)'' (Inouye, Flannelly, & Flannelly, 2001) ''Dealing with Illness Scale (DIS)'' (McCain, Zeller, Cella, Urbanski, & Novak, 1996;McCain et al, 2008), ''the Dealing with Illness Coping Inventory'' (Targ et al, 1994), ''Sense of Coherence questionnaire'' (Weber et al, 1999) and ''Information-seeking coping'' (Kalichman et al, 2006).…”
Section: Coping Measurement Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%