2018
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201824512003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fourth industrial revolution and the paradigm change in engineering education

Abstract: The article discusses the main features of the fourth industrial revolution and its impact on the transformation of the labor market and the transition to a new paradigm of education. Authors analyze new requirements for the graduates competence and modern world educational trends. Much attention is paid to strengthening of the project nature of education, blurring the distinction between traditional technical and humanitarian education. Moreover, the authors examine the shift of engineering work with its basi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, a key advantage identified in Naidoo's (2020) study was the creation of virtual communities, which could be a solution to the educators' perceived challenge of loss of student interactions and collaboration (Cassibba et al, 2021;Lopez et al, 2021;Sulistyani et al, 2021). The challenges identified by the postsecondary students supported existing literature indicating lack of readiness for e-Learning (Sakhapov & Absalyamova, 2018), possible distractions at home, and other psychosocial factors (Neuwirth et al 2020). The challenge of family responsibilities may be especially pronounced for postsecondary students who have children (Naidoo, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, a key advantage identified in Naidoo's (2020) study was the creation of virtual communities, which could be a solution to the educators' perceived challenge of loss of student interactions and collaboration (Cassibba et al, 2021;Lopez et al, 2021;Sulistyani et al, 2021). The challenges identified by the postsecondary students supported existing literature indicating lack of readiness for e-Learning (Sakhapov & Absalyamova, 2018), possible distractions at home, and other psychosocial factors (Neuwirth et al 2020). The challenge of family responsibilities may be especially pronounced for postsecondary students who have children (Naidoo, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…E-Learning has been defined as the use of various types of information and communications technologies (ICT), such as e-mail, software, and learning management systems (LMS), among others, for the purposes of education (Ayu, 2020). E-Learning is a part of the fourth industrial revolution (4IR), which involves the technological integration of the physical, biological, and digital aspects of life (Sakhapov & Absalyamova, 2018). Although the 4IR began earlier than the Covid-19 pandemic, disparities in terms of readiness still exists between nations and between individuals (Naidoo, 2020; Sakhapov & Absalyamova, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another direction of education development is strengthening its project nature, blurring the distinction between traditional technical and humanitarian education. This requires the creation of new interdisciplinary courses, the revision of the classical approaches to engineering and humanitarian education [21]. Rethinking the civil engineering profession will in turn shape the service to society and consequently can enhance the welfare of humanity.…”
Section: Shaping the Future Of The Engineering Professionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They, however, have trouble finding relevant content, since they are unfamiliar with cobot technology and lack clear best practices from industry. Despite the large number of research endeavors being devoted to uncovering relevant capacities for jobs in today's and tomorrow's industry, such as 21 st century skills (Chu et al, 2021) and futureproof engineering education (Sakhapov & Absalyamova, 2018), these have not yet been specified for human-cobot collaboration (Libert, Mosconi & Cadieux, 2020). As a result, the local engineering educators' need for engineering education that prepares future production workers and engineers for human-cobot collaboration remains unfulfilled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%