E fforts to eradicate cardiovascular disease (CVD) are progressing no faster than The Race for the Cure 1 is in breast cancer. In the case of CVD, although therapies for the ravages of atherosclerosis continue to improve, the prevalence of disease is more than keeping pace. Recently, the World Health Organization has predicted that today's 17 million deaths worldwide attributable to heart disease and stroke will increase to more than 20 million by the year 2020, thus becoming the leading cause of death and disability in the world. 2 Most commonly blamed factors for the increase in CVD are increases in insulin resistance and type II diabetes as a result of dietary changes and more sedentary lifestyles.Indeed, the pieces of the puzzle seem to be comprehensible.(1) Accompanying the changes in diet and lifestyle, the prevalence of obesity has exploded. (2) Innumerable studies have established that obesity predisposes to insulin resistance, a harbinger of type II diabetes. (3) Nearly all serum and histochemical markers of inflammation are increased in insulin resistance and diabetes. (4) Obesity also tips the balance between fibrinolysis and thrombosis toward the latter. (5) Obesity is, thus, a major risk factor for CVD and stroke. The data supporting this paradigm are intellectually compelling, and appear as unassailable as the Cadbury Fortress (the reputed site of King Arthur's Camelot) and supported by the scientific community at the highest levels. 3 So why question this paradigm? Because reports continue to appear that bring the theory into question, most recently the results from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial. 4 The WHI enrolled nearly 50 000 postmenopausal women, ages 50 to 79. The subjects were randomized into either an intervention group, in which behavior modification was used to reduce fat and increase the intake of fruit, vegetables and grains, or a control group. Over an average of 8.1 years of follow-up, there was no reduction in CVD (neither in breast nor colon cancer). These findings do not render the hypothesis that obesity contributes to CVD vacuous. Rather, they argue that our knowledge of molecular pathways and factors that influence them remains inadequate, as was proposed in relation to the lack of an effect of diet on breast cancer. 5 It is in this context that the report of Fujita et al 6 in this issue of Circulation Research is of significant interest. The data presented here link winged helix family transcription factor Foxc2 to the inflammatory cytokine, TGF-1, and to expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1), a key regulator of intravascular thrombosis. Foxc2 has been previously implicated in insulin resistance. Targeted overexpression of Foxc2 in mouse adipose tissue produces a phenotype that resists diet-induced insulin resistance and obesity. 7 Human genetic studies also suggested a relationship between Foxc2 and insulin resistance and type II diabetes, albeit less robust than the relationship demonstrated in mic...