2017
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FQC Dashboard: integrates FastQC results into a web-based, interactive, and extensible FASTQ quality control tool

Abstract: SummaryFQC is software that facilitates quality control of FASTQ files by carrying out a QC protocol using FastQC, parsing results, and aggregating quality metrics into an interactive dashboard designed to richly summarize individual sequencing runs. The dashboard groups samples in dropdowns for navigation among the data sets, utilizes human-readable configuration files to manipulate the pages and tabs, and is extensible with CSV data.Availability and implementationFQC is implemented in Python 3 and Javascript… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
443
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 699 publications
(446 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
443
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Read pairs with a read mean quality score below 30 or a read length shorter than 75 of the read length (i.e.,105bp) were also discarded. FastQCv0.11.7 [17] was performed on the remaining reads (Pass Filter Reads). Paired-end FASTQ files were separately merged in case of multiple read files for the same sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Read pairs with a read mean quality score below 30 or a read length shorter than 75 of the read length (i.e.,105bp) were also discarded. FastQCv0.11.7 [17] was performed on the remaining reads (Pass Filter Reads). Paired-end FASTQ files were separately merged in case of multiple read files for the same sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3'prime mRNA-seq libraries containing unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) were prepared De-multiplexed FASTQ files were inspected for quality using FASTQC (Brown et al, 2017). Reads were aligned to GRCh38 using the STAR two-pass method (Dobin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Mrna-seq Library Preparation and Data Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained an average of 180.9 billion total raw bases per sample (range 117.81 to 523.49 billion bases). The quality of raw fastq files was assessed using FASTQC (Brown et al, 2017). Reads were then aligned to the human b37 genome assembly with decoy sequences included and a Sendai virus contig with the BWA-mem algorithm under default parameters .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%