Fractal geometry receives recently increasing attention in analyzing natural scenes. The fractal diiaension of a surface image has been used as segmentation feature, but since it is not sufficient to characterize important configurative texture characteristics, additional features are necessary. In this work we use a combination of fractal and non-fractal features to segment and classify natural textures.
INTRODUCTIONTextural features are important pattern elements in both human and machine vision. The problem of segmentation and classification of textured images has been widely studied and several approaches based on either statistical or structural representations have been proposed [1]. During the recent years fractal geometry has been used in an effort for a unified image model. The fractal model introduced by Mandelbrot [2] has been quite successful in modeling a wide variety of physical phenomena. Another area where fractals have been used is computer graphics. Synthesized fractal sets have striking resemblance to natural objects (clouds, trees, mountains, etc.), and this suggested that fractals might also be successfully applied to image analysis. As a result, the fractal model received considerable attention in describing natural surfaces and also in texture discrimination.A basic characteristic of a fractal set is the fractal dimension D. From an intuitive point of view, D corresponds to the concept of roughness; i.e. for a plane D is 2 (equal to the topological dimension) , while for highly irregular (space filling) surfaces D approaches 3. Fractals can be either deterministic or statistical. A fundamental property of deterministic fractals is selfsimilarity; i.e. the set looks the same at all scales. As a consequence, the fractal dimension remains invariant to scale variations. Statistical fractals maintain self-similarity in a statistical sense. Physical fractals have the self-similarity property over some limited range of scale. Among the several segmentation algorithms based on fractal dimension alone that have been proposed [3][4][5][6][7], their basic difference lays in the approach used to estimate the local D parameter of the textured surface. Their performance, however, is limited because, as it was reported by several researchers, the fractal dimension alone is not sufficient to characterize natural textures [8][9][10]. Furthermore, segmentation 46 / SPIE Vol. 1521 Image Understanding for Aerospace Applications(1991) Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 06/16/2016 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/TermsOfUse.aspx