2003
DOI: 10.1142/s0218348x03001665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractal Dimensions and Corrections to Scaling for Critical Potts Clusters

Abstract: Renormalization group and Coulomb gas mappings are used to derive theoretical predictions for the corrections to the exactly known asymptotic fractal masses of the hull, external perimeter, singly connected bonds and total mass of the Fortuin-Kasteleyn clusters for two-dimensional q-state Potts models at criticality. For q = 4 these include exact logarithmic (as well as log-log) corrections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It turns out that also a few years ago, Aharony and Asikainen [20,21] proposed the same two leading correction exponents ω = 3/2 and 2 for the correction-toscaling for fractal properties of the complete hulls of percolation clusters, relating them to earlier results of den Nijs [41]. Evidently, these same corrections to apply to the cluster statistics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It turns out that also a few years ago, Aharony and Asikainen [20,21] proposed the same two leading correction exponents ω = 3/2 and 2 for the correction-toscaling for fractal properties of the complete hulls of percolation clusters, relating them to earlier results of den Nijs [41]. Evidently, these same corrections to apply to the cluster statistics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Evidently, these same corrections to apply to the cluster statistics. Note that the results of [20] have not been verified numerically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The triangular lattice has the advantage of allowing for a unambiguous interface definition, i. e. with no need to define a "tiebreak" rule to deal with four-lines junctions as is the case for the square lattice; on the other hand, it seems that this geometry somewhat enhances the finite-size effects, requiring simulating very large systems to achieve a stable value for D (as opposed, for instance, to the rather stable results from moderate sizes for the square lattice [20]). Moreover, even though we could not apply the predictions in [27] for the subleading terms in S(L) (because they are formulated in a different setting than ours), there are some indications that fitting numerical data simply to the leading-order behaviour does not give reliable fractal dimensions. Another potential concern is our choice -widely common in literature -of working with square aspect ratios ℓ = 1: as shown by the test of jagged vs. non-jagged boundary conditions, a proper determination of D should reasonably be conducted on systems fulfilling to some extent the requirement L x ≫ L y .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We also tried, at the Potts point, other functional forms inspired by the RG arguments in [27], but they had to be discarded in favour of the above.…”
Section: Fractal Dimension From the Interface Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9. Here we show an alternate way of analyzing the data, where we plot s τ −2 P ≥s vs. s −Ω where Ω = 72/91 [21,22] …”
Section: Generator II On Hypergraph Amentioning
confidence: 99%