2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00039-013-0225-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractal Weyl laws for asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds

Abstract: For asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds with hyperbolic trapped sets we prove a fractal upper bound on the number of resonances near the essential spectrum, with power determined by the dimension of the trapped set. This covers the case of general convex cocompact quotients (including the case of connected trapped sets) where our result implies a bound on the number of zeros of the Selberg zeta function in disks of arbitrary size along the imaginary axis. Although no sharp fractal lower bounds are known, the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that a fractal upper bound for resonances should be valid for more general quotients \H n than the ones considered in [53]-see Guillarmou-Mazzeo Fig. 2) with real parts with | Re λ| ≤ 2 × 10 3 computed using a semiclassical zeta function [170].…”
Section: Theorem 13mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We remark that a fractal upper bound for resonances should be valid for more general quotients \H n than the ones considered in [53]-see Guillarmou-Mazzeo Fig. 2) with real parts with | Re λ| ≤ 2 × 10 3 computed using a semiclassical zeta function [170].…”
Section: Theorem 13mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For a canonical transformation κ with a fixed antiderivative F , we consider the class I comp h (κ) of compactly supported and microlocalized Fourier integral operators associated to κ -see for instance [GuSt77,Chapter 5], [GuSt13,Chapter 8], [DyGu14a,§3.2], [DaDy,§3.2], † [Dy,§3.2], and the references there. We adopt a convention that operators in I comp h (κ) act D (M 2 ) → C ∞ 0 (M 1 ).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this encodes the behaviour of the full symbol of A at h = 0 everywhere on T * X, as well as the behaviour at the fiber infinity ∂T * X for small, but positive, values of h -see [Va,§2.1]. We cannot use the more convenient space of classical operators, whose principal symbol is just a function on T * X (see [DaDy,§3.1]) because the symbol of the operator e sG(h) Pe −sG(h) (see §3) has the form p + ishH p G, with p ∈ S 1 (X) and H p G = O(log(2 + |ξ|)) narrowly missing the class S 0 (X). The (open) elliptic set ell h (A) ⊂ T * X is defined as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for an h-tempered family of distributions u = u(h), see for example [Zw,§8.4.2], [DaDy,§3.1]. Similarly to WF(u), the set WF h (u) can be characterized using the Fourier transform as follows: (x, ξ) ∈ WF h (u) if and only if there exists χ ∈ C ∞ c (X) supported in some coordinate neighbourhood, with χ(x) = 0, and a neighbourhood…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%