1985
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.82.24.8478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fraction of myosin cross-bridges bound to actin in active muscle fibers: estimation by fluorescence anisotropy measurements.

Abstract: Time-resolved and steady-state fluorescence anisotropy measurements from fluorescence-labeled myosin cross-bridges in single glycerinated skeletal muscle fibers in rigor, relaxed, MgADP-induced, and contracting states have been made in order to estimate the fraction of actin-bound cross-bridges in active muscle. When the plane of polarization of the excitation light is perpendicular to the fiber axis and its propagation vector has a component parallel to this axis, actin-bound cross-bridge states, such as rigo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on our estimate of the limit of detectability of the heads still diffracting with a 14.3 nm spacing at peak tension, we conclude that 70%, or more of the heads are forming part of the AM complex at the plateau of tension. This is in agreement with figures for myosin head attachment based on the changes in intensity of the equatorial [I, 0, 0] and [1, 1, 0] reflections (Haselgrove & Huxley, 1973;Matsubara et al, 1975;Squire, 1981) and with the deduction from fluorescence depolarization investigations (Burghardt & Ajtai, 1985). It is also compatible with an interpretation of ESR data (Cooke et aI., 1982) which suggests that during isometric contraction approximately 80% of the probes are randomly oriented.…”
Section: Extent Of Random Axial Rotations Of the Myosin Heads At The supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Based on our estimate of the limit of detectability of the heads still diffracting with a 14.3 nm spacing at peak tension, we conclude that 70%, or more of the heads are forming part of the AM complex at the plateau of tension. This is in agreement with figures for myosin head attachment based on the changes in intensity of the equatorial [I, 0, 0] and [1, 1, 0] reflections (Haselgrove & Huxley, 1973;Matsubara et al, 1975;Squire, 1981) and with the deduction from fluorescence depolarization investigations (Burghardt & Ajtai, 1985). It is also compatible with an interpretation of ESR data (Cooke et aI., 1982) which suggests that during isometric contraction approximately 80% of the probes are randomly oriented.…”
Section: Extent Of Random Axial Rotations Of the Myosin Heads At The supporting
confidence: 80%
“…High sensitivity of the above-mentioned motions to physiological fluctuations of Ca 2 § concentration [108,131] and the fact that these low-frequency motions (segmentary, rotational, and vibrational [84,115]) with microsecond rates are detected in functionally active protein regions (in C-terminal and with a some-what lower rate in N-terminal regions of actin polypeptide chain [52,131 ]) additionally confirm their role in force generation. Finally, the involvement of these motions in disturbances of myocardial contractility is confirmed by inhibition of nano-, micro-, and millisecond motions in actin protomer in HF caused by TAM, ATC, and LTC.…”
Section: Causes Of Changes In Submolecular Actomyosin Structure In Hfmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…[107,115,129,131]), as well as from micro-to nanoseconds (motion of individual amino acid residues, and further to pico-and femtoseconds [58]. These high-frequency motions have no forcegenerating effect, but they underlie milli-and subnanosecond force-generating conformation transformations: there are direct correlations between subnanosecon movements of thin filaments in glycerinated muscle fibers and rigor tension [52] and between nanosecond motions in myosin (probably around the ATPase center) and generated force [129].…”
Section: Causes Of Changes In Submolecular Actomyosin Structure In Hfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case there was disagreement between findings using the probes 1,5-IAEDANS and IATR such that the former probe did not, while the latter probe did, sense a cross-bridge orientation change upon the binding of MgADP. It was suggested (Burghardt and Ajtai, 1985) and later confirmed experimentally (Ajtai and Burghardt, 1987) that this conflict was due to the differing orientations of the probes on the cross-bridge such that the transition dipole of IATR was in a favorable, while the dipole of 1,5-IAEDANS was in an unfavorable, orientation for detecting cross-bridge rotation. This explanation was confirmed using the technique of wavelength dependent fluorescence polarization where the transition dipole orientation of the 1,5-IAEDANS was changed, by varying the wavelength of the excitation light, and the cross-bridge rotation caused by the binding of MgADP was detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%