2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10898-019-00817-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractional 0–1 programs: links between mixed-integer linear and conic quadratic formulations

Abstract: This paper focuses on methods that improve the performance of solution approaches for multiple-ratio fractional 0-1 programs (FPs) in their general structure. In particular, we explore the links between equivalent mixed-integer linear programming and conic quadratic programming reformulations of FPs. Thereby, we show that integrating the ideas behind these two types of reformulations of FPs allows us to push further the limits of the current state-of-the-art results and tackle larger-size problems. We perform … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To summarize these results, we observe that MILP 1 [8 ab ] tends to have the best continuous relaxation bound. This observation is consistent with the earlier observations in the literature that the corresponding nominal reformulation FP 1 typically has the best relaxation quality (Borrero et al 2016, Mehmanchi et al 2019. Nonetheless, this does not always (or even often) lead to superior solution times mainly because of the large size of the reformulation.…”
Section: Disjoint Reformulationssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To summarize these results, we observe that MILP 1 [8 ab ] tends to have the best continuous relaxation bound. This observation is consistent with the earlier observations in the literature that the corresponding nominal reformulation FP 1 typically has the best relaxation quality (Borrero et al 2016, Mehmanchi et al 2019. Nonetheless, this does not always (or even often) lead to superior solution times mainly because of the large size of the reformulation.…”
Section: Disjoint Reformulationssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is also possible to develop a binary expansion reformulation of RFP 1 [8 ab ]. However, based on our experiments, such a formulation performs poorly in computations; also, refer to Borrero et al 2016and Mehmanchi et al (2019) for an analogous comparison regarding deterministic FP. Hence, we omit this formulation for brevity.…”
Section: Disjoint Uncertainty Setmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model presented in the previous section is a multiple-ratio quadratic 0-1 fractional programming model as the highest order of the product of binary variables in the objective function is two, and the objective function is expressed as the sum of G ratios [41][42][43][44]. A quadratic 0-1 programming model can be converted into a linear 0-1 programming one by introducing a new set of 0-1 variables (one for each quadratic term included in the base model) and additional constraints [28].…”
Section: Model Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assumption A1 is standard in fractional optimization [10,11,34]. In particular, it ensures that the objective function is well defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%