2019
DOI: 10.3934/dcds.2019054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractional equations with indefinite nonlinearities

Abstract: In this paper, we consider a fractional equation with indefinite nonlinearities (−) α/2 u = a(x 1)f (u) for 0 < α < 2, where a and f are nondecreasing functions. We prove that there is no positive bounded solution. In particular, in the case a(x 1) = x 1 and f (u) = u p , this remarkably improves the result in [15] by extending the range of α from [1, 2) to (0, 2), due to the introduction of new ideas, which may be applied to solve many other similar problems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the classical BECs problem when s = 1, p = 3 and N = 2, 3 in [30], the standard comparison method from the ODE theory is sufficed to show such a non-existence result, which, however, is invalid in the fractional case. We take the sliding method to overcome this obstacle, which, developed by Chen, Li and Zhu [11], would be typically available in the study of some other similar problems when dealing with the fractional operator.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11 By a Non-existence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the classical BECs problem when s = 1, p = 3 and N = 2, 3 in [30], the standard comparison method from the ODE theory is sufficed to show such a non-existence result, which, however, is invalid in the fractional case. We take the sliding method to overcome this obstacle, which, developed by Chen, Li and Zhu [11], would be typically available in the study of some other similar problems when dealing with the fractional operator.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11 By a Non-existence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where e 1 = (1, 0, ..., 0), and σ is a small positive number to be chosen as in the proof of Theorem 1 in [12]. Obviously, wλ (x, t) and w λ (x, t) have the same sign and lim |x|→+∞ wλ (x, t) = 0.…”
Section: More Relevant Liouville Type Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence it is reasonable to assume that u is bounded when we consider equation (40). Without the condition lim |x|→∞ u(x) = 0, in order to use the method of moving planes, in [22], an auxiliary function was introduced, so that the planes can still be moved along x 1 direction all the way up to ∞ to derive…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a minimum ofw λ , the middle term on the right hand side (the integral) neither vanishes nor has a definite sign. This is the main difficulty encountered by the fractional nonlocal operator, and to circumvent which, the authors in [22] introduced a different auxiliary function and estimate (− ) α/2 w λ in an entirely different approach.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%