2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2010.5628095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractional fourier-based filter for denoising elastograms

Abstract: In ultrasound elastography, tissue axial strains are obtained through the differentiation of axial displacements. However, the application of the gradient operator amplifies the noise present in the displacement rendering unreadable axial strains. In this paper a novel denoising scheme based on repeated filtering in consecutive fractional Fourier transform domains is proposed for the accurate estimation of axial strains. The presented method generates a time-varying cutoff threshold that can accommodate the di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FrFT-based denoising method [5] and the masked STFT scheme described in [6] were applied to the same noisy realization of the simulated elastogram that was used for all the presented results. The parameters required for the latter two methods were determined empirically as this was done in [5] and [6], respectively. For the given realization the FrFT-based method achieved a CNR e value of 65.69dB whereas the masked STFT approach resulted in a value of 60.60dB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The FrFT-based denoising method [5] and the masked STFT scheme described in [6] were applied to the same noisy realization of the simulated elastogram that was used for all the presented results. The parameters required for the latter two methods were determined empirically as this was done in [5] and [6], respectively. For the given realization the FrFT-based method achieved a CNR e value of 65.69dB whereas the masked STFT approach resulted in a value of 60.60dB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental outcomes indicate that the method can outperform the other schemes with respect to the achieved CNR e values, and also according to what visual inspection of the resulting elastograms suggests. It should be noted that each of the two modern approaches included in our comparisons had independently been shown [5], [6] to be superior to commonly used denoising approaches for the elastogram. Further experimentation involving clinical data will have to follow in order to validate this new approach and fully assess its advantages and limitations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation