2020
DOI: 10.1002/mma.6213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractional h‐differences with exponential kernels and their monotonicity properties

Abstract: In this work, the nabla fractional differences of order 0 < < 1 with discrete exponential kernels are formulated on the time scale hZ, where 0 < h ≤ 1.Hence, the earlier results obtained in Adv. Differ. Equ., 2017, (78) (2017) are generalized. The monotonicity properties of the h-Caputo-Fabrizio (CF) fractional difference operator are concluded using its relation with the nabla h-Riemann-Liouville (RL) fractional difference operator. It is shown that the monotonicity coefficient depends on the step h, and this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fernandez and Mohammed 37 have derived results for the Hermite-Hadamard inequality and its related in the context of fractional integrals and derivatives defined by Mittag-Leffler kernels. Suwan et al 38 formulated the nabla fractional differences of order in (0,1) with discrete exponential kernels on the time scale, which generalized some earlier results. They have also applied their results to prove a fractional difference version of the mean value theorem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Fernandez and Mohammed 37 have derived results for the Hermite-Hadamard inequality and its related in the context of fractional integrals and derivatives defined by Mittag-Leffler kernels. Suwan et al 38 formulated the nabla fractional differences of order in (0,1) with discrete exponential kernels on the time scale, which generalized some earlier results. They have also applied their results to prove a fractional difference version of the mean value theorem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…• Additionally, we have established a new version of the MVT in the frame fractional differences in the setting of generalized AB. • In the case of the case hZ in the setting of discrete ML-kernel (AB) [30] and discrete exponential kernel [34], it was noticed that the monotonicity factor depends on the step h. However, for the discrete power law case [31] the monotonicity factor is independent of the step h. Since our results in this article generalize those in [29], it is of interest to generalize the results in this article for the hZ case so that the monotonicity factor will depend on δ, γ , and h! • We have been able to address the monotonicity analysis for the ML kernels with parameters 0 < δ < 0.5, β = 1, and 0 < γ ≤ 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where A is some nonnegative number and Δ 𝛼 y is some type of fractional difference of y. Studies of this form include papers by Atici et al, 23 Du et al, 24 Goodrich, 25 Goodrich and Jonnalagadda, 26 Goodrich et al, 27 Jia et al, [28][29][30] Liu et al, 31 Mohammed et al, 32,33 Suwan et al, 34 and Suwan et al 35 ; we point out, off hand, that, somewhat curiously, there does not seem to be the same sort of activity in the continuous fractional frame, and, in fact, the only work of which we are aware in this direction is a paper by Diethelm. 36 Usually in these studies, the number A in (1.2) has been taken to be 0 since this is the natural and obvious analogue of the integer-order setting in which one has the result "(Δy)(𝜏) ≥ 0 ⇒ y is increasing."…”
Section: Some Additional Conditions (If Necessary)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, there are papers that have studied a single fractional difference—i.e., theorems that take the following form: ()normalΔαmonospaceyfalse(nfalse)ASome Additional Conditions (if necessary)0.30emmonospacey.5emis positive and/or monotone and/or convex, where A is some nonnegative number and Δ α y is some type of fractional difference of y. Studies of this form include papers by Atici et al, 23 Du et al, 24 Goodrich, 25 Goodrich and Jonnalagadda, 26 Goodrich et al, 27 Jia et al, 28–30 Liu et al, 31 Mohammed et al, 32,33 Suwan et al, 34 and Suwan et al 35 ; we point out, off hand, that, somewhat curiously, there does not seem to be the same sort of activity in the continuous fractional frame, and, in fact, the only work of which we are aware in this direction is a paper by Diethelm 36 . Usually in these studies, the number A in () has been taken to be 0 since this is the natural and obvious analogue of the integer‐order setting in which one has the result “ false(normalΔmonospaceyfalse)false(τfalse)0monospacey.5emis increasing.” Nonetheless, the recent paper by Goodrich and Lizama 37 studied in extensive detail the case in which A > 0, and a subsequent paper by Goodrich and Muellner 38 also considered such cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%