2010 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ecce.2010.5617858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractional-slot concentrated-winding axial-flux permanent magnet machine with core-wound coils

Abstract: This paper presents the design, finite element analysis (FEA) and experimental verification of a single stator double rotor fractional-slot concentrated-winding (FSCW) axial-flux permanent magnet (AFPM) machine, with core-wound coils. The advantages that are obtained by adopting such coil construction, in terms of shorter end-winding connections, higher fill factor and mechanical robustness of the magnetic structure are highlighted. Machine performances both at no load and at rated load are analyzed through st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two 10-kW water-cooled TORUS type AFPM machines with fractional-slot (FS) CW (FSCW) (24-slot/20-pole) and integral-slot (IS) CW (ISCW) (60-slot/20-pole) are designed and prototyped in [23] and [24] respectively, as shown in FIGURE 5. Among all possible values to form FSCW, the slot number per pole per phase (SPP) has been selected as 2/5 in [23] because of the high fundamental winding factor (0.966) and inherently low cogging torque. The end-turn length of the core-wound and tooth-wound coil configurations is compared based on the average end-turn model of the proposed FSCW TORUS machine.…”
Section: B Winding Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two 10-kW water-cooled TORUS type AFPM machines with fractional-slot (FS) CW (FSCW) (24-slot/20-pole) and integral-slot (IS) CW (ISCW) (60-slot/20-pole) are designed and prototyped in [23] and [24] respectively, as shown in FIGURE 5. Among all possible values to form FSCW, the slot number per pole per phase (SPP) has been selected as 2/5 in [23] because of the high fundamental winding factor (0.966) and inherently low cogging torque. The end-turn length of the core-wound and tooth-wound coil configurations is compared based on the average end-turn model of the proposed FSCW TORUS machine.…”
Section: B Winding Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stator-slot and rotor-pole numbers are generally selected according to the power rating and motor size before parametric design and optimization. Fractional slots SPP is preferred for a high fundamental winding factor and inherently low cogging torque [23]. Even numbers of both slots and poles are required for a symmetrical disposition of stator coils and rotor poles to avoid unbalanced magnetic force [31].…”
Section: Design Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With such windings the concentrated coils are wound either on adjacent or alternate teeth, which reduces the end winding length. Furthermore, a significant reduction of the copper loss is achieved, and the machine efficiency is improved [8][9][10]. Compared with traditional distributed windings, FSCW have low mutual inductances between phases, which meet the magnetic isolation demands of phase windings for multiphase fault-tolerant PMSM [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the external‐rotor arrangement is considered especially advantageous where the space is limited, mechanical robustness is required and torque‐to‐volume ratio is crucial [15]. The double‐sided slotted TORUS AFPM motors are the most frequently applied among the other configurations, as they are mechanically stronger and have higher power density than the other configurations [16]. So, the slotted TORUS AFPM motor is used here for modelling and simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%