1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(00)80863-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractionation and concentration of lignosulphonates by ultrafiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…UF, a pressure-driven rate governed membrane separation process in which components of a mixture are separated by preferential transport of solutes through membrane, has been used to separate spent liquor into purified fractions of lignosulphonates and sugars [3--6]. RO has also been extensively used for concentration ofsulfite liquor and bleach plant effluent [6][7][8][9]. A combination of UF and continuous diafiltration has been used to purify lignosulphonates [ 10,11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UF, a pressure-driven rate governed membrane separation process in which components of a mixture are separated by preferential transport of solutes through membrane, has been used to separate spent liquor into purified fractions of lignosulphonates and sugars [3--6]. RO has also been extensively used for concentration ofsulfite liquor and bleach plant effluent [6][7][8][9]. A combination of UF and continuous diafiltration has been used to purify lignosulphonates [ 10,11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been possible in some cases [7,8] to describe the rejection of polymer molecules using the theory of reverse osmosis/nano-filtration separation, originally developed for small molecules [9,10]. However, this approach does not explain the deviations of the filtration velocity, found in the ultrafiltration experiments reported here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The observed rejection showed a characteristic maximum in the rejection as a result of the decrease in rejection at higher fluxes due to concentration polarization [ 19]. The permeate was collected in four separate streams (see Method): the rejections for positions 2-4 were similar, however higher rejections were measured at the first position in the flux region where concentration polarization becomes important.…”
Section: Silica Deposits Peg Rejection In the Presence Of An Aerosil mentioning
confidence: 99%