1967
DOI: 10.1038/216511b0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractionation of Protein Solutions by Membrane Partition Chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These membranes have been shown to be selective molecular filters. allowing passage of substances on the basis of molecular weight and configuration (15). Assuming that this property of Diaflow membranes is applicable to the conditions of this study, the results summarized in Table IV suggest that the molecular weight of the factor inhibiting SCC is probably no greater than 3000.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…These membranes have been shown to be selective molecular filters. allowing passage of substances on the basis of molecular weight and configuration (15). Assuming that this property of Diaflow membranes is applicable to the conditions of this study, the results summarized in Table IV suggest that the molecular weight of the factor inhibiting SCC is probably no greater than 3000.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…To characterize further the active component in the supernatant, serial fractionation by membrane partition chromatography was performed using Amicon Ultra‐15 centrifugal filter units (Millipore, Carrigtwohill, Ireland) according to the manufacturer's guidelines based on a protocol published previously [24]. In brief, dissolved yeast supernatant was spun in an Amicon Ultra‐15 centrifugal filter device with a 100 kDa nominal molecular weight limit at 4°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fraction retained by the membrane was washed with portions of distilled water until the filtrate contained 5 mg. carbon per liter (or less) and then passed through a UM-10 membrane in the same manner. Finally, after washing, the (Blatt, Feinberg, et al, 1965) and since (Michaels, 1965;Wake and Posner, 1967; Blatt, Hudson, et al, 1967). mg C =12 7.…”
Section: Um-2 Um-20 Um-20ementioning
confidence: 99%