2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7037(00)00579-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractionation of sulfur isotopes during bacterial sulfate reduction in deep ocean sediments at elevated temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
90
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
90
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Above and below the sulfidic zone, elemental sulfur, and iron monosulfide phases build up, a process that is fueled by sulfide oxidation, which yields S 0 and ferrous iron and induces the precipitation of iron monosulfides through reaction with ferrous iron. Because of the distinct locations of these processes with respect to the center of the SMT, the produced sulfur phases record sulfur isotope signatures for sulfide that are representative for the isotope trends observed in the SMTthat is, a strong enrichment in 34 S from the top to the bottom of the SMT (e.g., Rudnicki et al, 2001;Brunner et al, 2016;Turchyn et al, 2016). These distinct isotope signatures allow the reconstruction of the complex history of biogeochemical sulfur cycling in dynamic sediments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above and below the sulfidic zone, elemental sulfur, and iron monosulfide phases build up, a process that is fueled by sulfide oxidation, which yields S 0 and ferrous iron and induces the precipitation of iron monosulfides through reaction with ferrous iron. Because of the distinct locations of these processes with respect to the center of the SMT, the produced sulfur phases record sulfur isotope signatures for sulfide that are representative for the isotope trends observed in the SMTthat is, a strong enrichment in 34 S from the top to the bottom of the SMT (e.g., Rudnicki et al, 2001;Brunner et al, 2016;Turchyn et al, 2016). These distinct isotope signatures allow the reconstruction of the complex history of biogeochemical sulfur cycling in dynamic sediments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few early experiments that were performed using H 2 as the electron donor yielded ε 34 S values ranging from Ϫ3 to Ϫ19‰ (22,38,39), which appear to correlate with the csSRR (39 (14) but is not consistent with the lack of significant fractionation observed during oxidative reactions (29). To explain the ⌬ 34 S values of Ϫ55 to Ϫ77‰ reported to occur in interstitial pore waters from 100-to 300-m-deep, hypersulfidic ocean sediments (51,64,67), where the presence of a S-oxidative cycle is unlikely, an alternative, elaborate model of the SO 4 2Ϫ -reducing pathway has been proposed by Brunner and Bernasconi (9 (23), with a corresponding cell turnover rate greater than 1,000 years (37).…”
Section: Dissimilatory Somentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Objective 2 will additionally be addressed by the examination of isotopic composition of sulfur species and phosphate, including multiple-sulfur-isotope approaches and dual-isotope analysis of sulfur and oxygen in sulfate and oxygen in phosphate. Recent studies (Ono et al, 2012;Rudnicki et al, 2001;Sim et al 2011) suggest that multiple-sulfur-isotope measurements are a powerful tool to trace the extent and temperature of microbial sulfate reduction. Likewise, oxygen isotope ratios of sulfate and phosphate will provide critical temperature information because oxygen isotope exchange is very slow below ~250°C; therefore, at low temperatures equilibrium-like fractionations for…”
Section: Electron Acceptors Nutrients and Major Anions And Cationsmentioning
confidence: 99%