Fracturas en la informatización de los servicios de salud

Artero, Carlos Campillo

doi:10.1157/13125361

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is worth pointing out that the organization of care, through territorial-based assignment of teams and the increasing computerization of its centres provides a suitable environment to carry out these types of studies in a clinical practice environment [18,19]. Thus, the quality of the measurements is a basic aspect in achieving an efficient health system, and we must be sure in any kind of biomedical research that measurement error is reasonably small.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical validity of a population database definition of remission in patients with major depression

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundMajor depression (MD) is one of the most frequent diagnoses in Primary Care. It is a disabling illness that increases the use of health resources. Aim: To describe the concordance between remission according to clinical assessment and remission obtained from the computerized prescription databases of patients with MD in a Spanish population.MethodsDesign: multicenter cross-sectional. The population under study was comprised of people from six primary care facilities, who had a MD episode between January 2003 and March 2007. A specialist in psychiatry assessed a random sample of patient histories and determined whether a certain patient was in remission according to clinical criteria (ICPC-2). Regarding the databases, patients were considered in remission when they did not need further prescriptions of AD for at least 6 months after completing treatment for a new episode. Validity indicators (sensitivity [S], specificity [Sp]) and clinical utility (positive and negative probability ratio [PPR] and [NPR]) were calculated. The concordance index was established using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Significance level was p < 0.05.Results133 patient histories were reviewed. The kappa coefficient was 82.8% (confidence intervals [CI] were 95%: 73.1 - 92.6), PPR 9.8% and NPR 0.1%. Allocation discrepancies between both criteria were found in 11 patients. S was 92.5% (CI was 95%: 88.0 - 96.9%) and Sp was 90.6% (CI was 95%: 85.6 - 95.6%), p < 0.001. Reliability analysis: Cronbach's alpha: 90.6% (CI was 95%: 85.6 - 95.6%).ConclusionsResults show an acceptable level of concordance between remission obtained from the computerized databases and clinical criteria. The major discrepancies were found in diagnostic accuracy.

show abstract