Fracture and fractography of experimental composites with different filler sizes

Pick, Bárbara; Meier, Márcia Margarete; Lohbauer, Ulrich; Braga, Roberto Ruggiero

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.096

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Cavalcante et al 25 found that Ormocer like Admira Fusion, containing no dimethacrylates, show higher solubility values, which are independent of the fillers, unlike composites containing dimethacrylates like Grandio.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Methacrylate versus Ormocer - Based Composites: Impact of Preheating on Repair Bond Strength

2023

Mansoura Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate and compare the impact of preheating on the repair bond strength of Methacrylate and Ormocer based composite. Materials and Methods: A total number of 24 standardized cuboid composite blocks were fabricated with the aid of teflon split mold (25×4×4) mm dimensions. Half of these composite blocks were made from a universal nanohybrid methacrylate-based composite and the other half was made from a universal nanohybrid Ormocer based. The top surfaces of all mounted specimens were surface treated with sandblasting, silane coupling agents, and universal adhesive of the same brand of composite. Four cylindrical composite rods (2 mm height, 3 mm internal diameter) were built over each composite block and filled with the repair composite from the same material with the aid of tygon tubes. Composite blocks of both groups were divided into two sub-groups according to the previous treatment of repairing materials (preheated or not preheated). Then half of the blocks with their attached repair materials were stored for 24 h to evaluate the immediate bond strength and the other half was stored in distilled water for 6 months to evaluate the bond durability. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine (Instron), and the collected data were statistically analyzed with three-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test. Results: The outcome of three-way ANOVA revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the repair bond strength of Methacrylate & Ormocer groups immediately and after 6 months of storage (p=0.03). No statistically significant difference was found between the repair bond strength of the preheated and non-preheated immediately and after 6 months of storage (p=0.7). Conclusions: Immediate and delayed repair bond strength of methacrylate-based resin composite was superior to Ormocer based composite within the preheated group. Preheating of both methacrylate and Ormocer composite did not affect immediate and delayed repair bond strength. Ormocer based composite groups could not succeed to maintain the repair bond strength after six months of storage, while methacrylate could maintain.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Methacrylate versus Ormocer - Based Composites: Impact of Preheating on Repair Bond Strength

2023

Mansoura Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Fracture and fractography of experimental composites with different filler sizes

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Methacrylate versus Ormocer - Based Composites: Impact of Preheating on Repair Bond Strength

Methacrylate versus Ormocer - Based Composites: Impact of Preheating on Repair Bond Strength

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About