1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(97)00130-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture behaviour of a SiC-particle-reinforced aluminium alloy at high temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous investigations, as given in Table I, have so far reported mixed results with both increases and decreases in the strength of the Al 7xxx series alloys reinforced with either micrometric or nanometric scale ceramic particulates. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Reduced strength has been linked with a number of factors, including the embrittlement effect of the particulate, particulate size, particulate clustering, deceleration in the aging kinetics of the matrix, interfacial reaction between the reinforcement and matrix, porosity issue, and the nature of synthesis route adopted. [10,11,15,16] Some investigations have found [8,9] that nanometric scale reinforcements are better than micrometric scale ones because of their effectiveness in blocking the dislocation motions, and because of their small size, they are less prone to crack or damage during the composite's synthesis process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous investigations, as given in Table I, have so far reported mixed results with both increases and decreases in the strength of the Al 7xxx series alloys reinforced with either micrometric or nanometric scale ceramic particulates. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Reduced strength has been linked with a number of factors, including the embrittlement effect of the particulate, particulate size, particulate clustering, deceleration in the aging kinetics of the matrix, interfacial reaction between the reinforcement and matrix, porosity issue, and the nature of synthesis route adopted. [10,11,15,16] Some investigations have found [8,9] that nanometric scale reinforcements are better than micrometric scale ones because of their effectiveness in blocking the dislocation motions, and because of their small size, they are less prone to crack or damage during the composite's synthesis process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow stress and ductility of A1-DMMCs are more affected by forming conditions than they are in unreinforced aluminium alloys [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. At low temperatures and high strain rates, plastic flow behavior is controlled by the reinforcing phase which determines higher flow stresses and lower ductilities than the matrix ones [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 shows the flow stress versus temperature curves, at different strain rates, for a strain of 0.4; flow stress decreases with increasing temperature and decreasing strain rate following the typical behavior of metals deformed in hot working conditions [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][22][23][24]. The ductility, measured by the equivalent strain to failure (ef), versus temperature, at constant strain rates, is shown in Figure 5; for a given temperature, ef increases with decreasing strain rate.…”
Section: Hot Formabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On a weight-adjusted basis, many Al-based metal matrix composites (MMCs) can outperform cast steel, Al, Mg and virtually any other reinforced metal or alloy in a wide variety of applications. Hence, it seems probable that such MMCs will replace conventional materials in many commercial and industrial applications in the near future [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%