2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture energy and mechanical characteristics of self-compacting concretes including waste bladder tyre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Replacement levels, as given in Table 1 , show that only a few authors replaced natural aggregate with rubber aggregate above level of 40% (Emiroğlu et al [ 6 ], Ismail and Hassan [ 7 ], and Uygunoğlu and Topçu [ 23 ]); in most experimental investigations the replacement level was 15% (Bideci et al [ 24 ]) or 20% (Ganesan et al [ 20 ], Mishra and Panda [ 19 ], Zaoiai et al [ 21 ]), all for the purpose of maintaining acceptable fresh SCC properties. Except for the similar final test results given above, most authors were prone to use different kind of chemical admixtures to maintain or even to improve fresh SCC properties, i.e., superplasticizer (SP) [ 1 , 5 , 6 , 19 , 20 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]; viscosity modified admixture (VMA) [ 5 , 20 , 26 , 27 ]; or, high range water reducer admixture (HRWRA) [ 7 , 14 , 22 , 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Fresh Scc Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Replacement levels, as given in Table 1 , show that only a few authors replaced natural aggregate with rubber aggregate above level of 40% (Emiroğlu et al [ 6 ], Ismail and Hassan [ 7 ], and Uygunoğlu and Topçu [ 23 ]); in most experimental investigations the replacement level was 15% (Bideci et al [ 24 ]) or 20% (Ganesan et al [ 20 ], Mishra and Panda [ 19 ], Zaoiai et al [ 21 ]), all for the purpose of maintaining acceptable fresh SCC properties. Except for the similar final test results given above, most authors were prone to use different kind of chemical admixtures to maintain or even to improve fresh SCC properties, i.e., superplasticizer (SP) [ 1 , 5 , 6 , 19 , 20 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]; viscosity modified admixture (VMA) [ 5 , 20 , 26 , 27 ]; or, high range water reducer admixture (HRWRA) [ 7 , 14 , 22 , 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Fresh Scc Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed a reduction in fracture energy by 10.91%, 13.03%, 18.55%, 24.01% and 28.05% when fine aggregate was replaced with 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25% crumb rubber (size 0–4 mm) by volume, respectively. The results of fracture energy testing carried out by Bideci et al [ 24 ] indicated that with inclusion of 10% and 15% of rubber aggregate content in SCC with length size of 50 mm, there was an increase in fracture energy of 1% and 5%; in all other cases, they reported a reduction in fracture energy by a maximum of 35%. Due to the lack of experimental results, it can be noted that detailed study of fracture energy of SCRC still needs to be done.…”
Section: Hardened Scc Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, a smaller number of authors investigated the self-compacting rubberized concrete (SCRC) in terms of concrete used for structural elements [8,[14][15][16]. The advantages of using recycled rubber as a substitute material for natural fine and/or coarse aggregate in concrete such as increased ductility, reduced total concrete mass, improved dynamic properties [17][18][19][20][21][22], increased freeze-thaw resistance [23][24][25][26][27], increased cracking resistance [16,28], increased fracture energy [22,29,30], and concrete resistance to tensile stresses [30] provide sufficient reasons to continue experimental research and laboratory work on reinforced concrete elements and system (columns, beams, frames) with a certain percentage of recycled rubber powder Dolomite powder, size < 0.063 mm, from a local quarry, with a specific gravity of 2.97 g/cm 3 and Blaine fineness of 5206 cm 2 /g was used as a filler. The density of cement, silica fume, and dolomite powder was tested according to ASTM C188-16:2011 [51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that waste tires hold toxic and soluble components, this may lead to the reduction of biodiversity in landfill sites. Generally, the cheapest and easiest method for decomposing waste tires is to burn them, which results in problems that harm human health and the environment [1][2][3][4]. In addition, the residue powder left after burning pollutes the soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%