“…Regarding the prediction of failure events in engineering materials and structures, the advent of new computational capabilities has promoted the generation of different numerical tools including diffusive crack methods (Bazant and Jirasek, 2002;Comi, 1999;Peerlings et al, 2001;Dimitrijevic and Hackl, 2011), strong discontinuity procedures (Moes et al, 1999;Linder and Armero, 2007;Oliver et al, 2006) and cohesive-like crack approaches (Camacho and Ortiz, 1996;Ortiz and Pandolfi, 1999;Paggi and Wriggers, 2012;Turon et al, 2018), among many others, where most of them rely on the exploitation of finite element(FE)-based procedures. Recent variational formulations and crack tracking algorithms based on the analogy between linear elastic fracture mechanics and standard dissipative systems can be found in (Salvadori and Fantoni, 2016;Salvadori et al, 2019). Derived from its versatility for the estimation of failure mechanisms due to crack initiation and growth, the seminal variational approach of fracture developed by Francfort and Marigo (1998), being denominated as the phase field approach of fracture, endows a smeared crack idealization that permits overcoming most of the limitations of alternative numerical methods.…”