2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture Resistance of Teeth Restored with Post-retained Restorations: An Overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
50
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
3
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Threaded posts are more retentive than cemented ones, but create more dentin stress during insertion [6,7]. To reduce the internal stress created by the threaded pins, limit the number of threads and release one thread by a reverse movement at the end of post insertion, have been taken into consideration [8,9].…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Threaded posts are more retentive than cemented ones, but create more dentin stress during insertion [6,7]. To reduce the internal stress created by the threaded pins, limit the number of threads and release one thread by a reverse movement at the end of post insertion, have been taken into consideration [8,9].…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of an intraradicular post for endodontically treated teeth has been indicated frequently in the clinical routine for fixed restorations, since the tooth becomes more fragile and susceptible to fracture after endodontic treatment 1 , especially in teeth with small amounts of coronal structure 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This biomechanical behaviour avoids the appearance of root fractures (4-6). Nonetheless, insufficient post rigidity could lead to excessive deformation and stress concentration zones during function, giving rise to marginal failure (7,8). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, there are dental factors such as how much of the tooth remains or whether there is a ferrule measuring at least 1.5-2 mm in length (8), and conditions such as periodontal status, relation to adjoining and opposing teeth, parafunction or habits that may constitute contraindications for tooth restoration. Secondly, there are post-related factors: length, taper, diameter and the material from which the post is made (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%