2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture stratigraphy and fluid flow properties of shallow-water, tight carbonates: The case study of the Murge Plateau (southern Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data gathering was focussed on the so-called throughgoing fractures which can reach tens of meters of height, playing a crucial role in fluid flow processes in a fractured carbonate reservoir, by linking together different fracture systems, otherwise isolated to each other and guaranteeing the vertical linkage of the network [79,80]. In this contest, primary heterogeneities provided by bed interfaces can, potentially, act as mechanical boundaries, inhibiting the vertical propagation and forming mechanical units at different scales [81]. Therefore, the definition of a detailed fracture stratigraphy relative to these seismic-scale structures (i.e., detectable at the seismic analysis resolution) can be fundamental to analysing the throughgoing fractures pattern and to individuate potential mechanical barriers.…”
Section: Large-scale Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data gathering was focussed on the so-called throughgoing fractures which can reach tens of meters of height, playing a crucial role in fluid flow processes in a fractured carbonate reservoir, by linking together different fracture systems, otherwise isolated to each other and guaranteeing the vertical linkage of the network [79,80]. In this contest, primary heterogeneities provided by bed interfaces can, potentially, act as mechanical boundaries, inhibiting the vertical propagation and forming mechanical units at different scales [81]. Therefore, the definition of a detailed fracture stratigraphy relative to these seismic-scale structures (i.e., detectable at the seismic analysis resolution) can be fundamental to analysing the throughgoing fractures pattern and to individuate potential mechanical barriers.…”
Section: Large-scale Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fracture intensity is defined by the parameter "N", number of fractures per volume unit, calculated for each set after a trigonometric correction relative to the outcropping surface orientation [78]. The aspect ratio was defined as the standard setting of 1:2 for non-stratabound fractures, whereas it was set as 1:4 for stratabound fractures [24,81,83]. Fracture length values were derived from the Subsequently, the gathered multi-scale dataset was used for DFN modelling, generating the individual fracture sets affecting each analysed formation.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high porosity carbonate rocks are mainly cataclastic, and the associated sub-seismic structures are mainly deformation zones, which are the most common structures in high porosity carbonate rocks (Fossen et al, 2007;Agosta and Tondi, 2010;Bastesen et al, 2013;Rotevatn et al, 2016;2017). However, low to non-porous carbonate rocks are dominated by shear fracturing, and associated sub-seismic structures are mainly fractures (Billi et al, 2003;Agosta, 2008;Woodcock et al, 2008;Bastesen et al, 2009;Michie and Haines, 2016;Panza et al, 2016). No matter what type of carbonate rock, cementation is also a common phenomenon in the fault zone of carbonate rock (Cooke et al, 2018).…”
Section: Results Internal Structural Characteristics Of Reverse Faults In the Carbonate Rockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the pEDFM approach can handle also DFM with low‐permeability fractures by adding non‐neighboring connections between the fracture and matrix‐grid cells. However, because of the complex numerical computations and input data, the scale of 3D rock‐block simulations in DFM and discrete fracture network (DFN) models is frequently constrained in a cube with border lengths less than 300–500 m (Panza et al., 2016). This cube size may not be appropriate for modeling fluid flow and pollutant transport in a productive karst aquifer, the regional scale corresponding to which exceeds 1–3 km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%