Fracture strength of composite resins for endodontically treated molars

Tekçe, Neslihan; Pala, Kanşad; Demırcı, Mustafa; Tuncer, Safa; Özel, Emre; Göktürk, Aslihan; Karakuyu, Hale

doi:10.1080/01694243.2016.1199371

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Three trials published in 2016 tested the fracture resistance of inlays fabricated from resin nanoceramic. Tekçe restored a sample of 10 endodontically-treated molars with Lava Ultimate (3 M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) inlays, afterwards stored in distilled water until they were evaluated using a universal test machine (Instron 6022, Instron Corp., Norwood, MA, USA), obtaining a maximum load of 2340.7 ± 366.52 N, with significant difference in comparison with a control group 2815.8 ± 222.67 N [21].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fracture Resistance of Partial Indirect Restorations Made with CAD/CAM Technology. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Amesti-Garaizabal

Agustín-Panadero

Verdejo-Solá

et al. 2019

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the fracture resistance and survival rate of partial indirect restorations inlays, onlays, and overlays fabricated using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology from ceramics, composite resin, resin nanoceramic, or hybrid ceramic and to analyze the influence of proximal box elevation on fracture resistance. Materials and methods: This systematic review was based on guidelines proposed by the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). An electronic search was conducted in databases US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), and Embase. In vitro trials published during the last 10 years were included in the review. Results: Applying inclusion criteria based on the review’s population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) question, 13 articles were selected. Meta-analysis by restoration type estimated the fracture resistance of inlays to be 1923.45 Newtons (N); of onlays 1644 N and of overlays 1383.6 N. Meta-analysis by restoration material obtained an estimated fracture resistance for ceramic of 1529.5 N, for composite resin of 1600 Ne, for resin nanoceramic 2478.7 N, and hybrid ceramic 2108 N. Conclusions: Resin nanoceramic inlays present significantly higher fracture resistance values. Proximal box elevation does not exert any influence on the fracture resistance of indirect restorations.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fracture Resistance of Partial Indirect Restorations Made with CAD/CAM Technology. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Amesti-Garaizabal

Agustín-Panadero

Verdejo-Solá

et al. 2019

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Using a 3 mm-diameter stainless steel rod, teeth from each group underwent the fracture strength test. The rod was centered on the occlusal surface of the restoration, and force was applied vertically until failure (14)(15)(16). The fracture strength value and fracture mode of each specimen were recorded and showed in Table 2 (17)(18)(19).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Fracture Strength and Total Void Amount in Composite Restorations on Endodontically Treated Teeth

Tekçe

Aydemir

Demırcı

et al. 2021

Odovtos - Int J Dent Sc

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the fracture strength of different composite resins and the quantity of voids in conventional posterior composite, high-flow flowable composite, bulk-fill flowable composite, and fiber-reinforced composite. Materials and Methods: Forty-four caries-free, freshly extracted mandibular premolars were used for this study. Teeth were prepared for cavity and root canal treatment. Subsequently, root canal treatment was applied to the teeth and cavities in order to prepare them for restorations. The specimens were then divided into four groups: group-1: Estelite Posterior; group-2: Estelite Flow Quick High Flow; group-3: Estelite Bulk-fill Flow; group-4: everX Posterior. One specimen from each experimental group was examined using micro-CT to perform measurement of voids. Results: The fracture strength values of high-flow flowable, bulk-fill flowable, fiber-reinforced, and conventional micro-hybrid composites were found to be similar (p=0.497). EverX Posterior showed the highest fracture strength values (841.1±149.4 N), followed by Estelite Bulk-fill Flow (822.8±170.8 N). Conclusion: Volume of voids (%) obtained from Micro-CT analysis revealed that restorations with high-flow liner or bulk-fill flowable exhibited more voids. The fiber-reinforced composite showed the lowest percentage volume of incorporating voids and the highest fracture strength results.

show abstract

Flexure strength of methacrylate- and ormocer-based bulk fill resin composites: effect of material thickness and distance to photo-polymerization device

El-Askary

Botros

Soliman

et al. 2020

Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fracture strength of composite resins for endodontically treated molars

Cited by 3 publications

References 27 publications

Fracture Resistance of Partial Indirect Restorations Made with CAD/CAM Technology. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Fracture Resistance of Partial Indirect Restorations Made with CAD/CAM Technology. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evaluation of Fracture Strength and Total Void Amount in Composite Restorations on Endodontically Treated Teeth

Flexure strength of methacrylate- and ormocer-based bulk fill resin composites: effect of material thickness and distance to photo-polymerization device

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About