2003
DOI: 10.1109/jmems.2003.814130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture strength of polysilicon at stress concentrations

Abstract: Mechanical design of MEMS requires the ability to predict the strength of load-carrying components with stress concentrations. The majority of these microdevices are made of brittle materials such as polysilicon, which exhibit higher fracture strengths when smaller volumes or areas are involved. A review of the literature shows that the fracture strength of polysilicon increases as tensile specimens get smaller. Very limited results show that fracture strengths at stress concentrations are larger. This paper e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
74
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar experimental results are discussed in a recent paper (Bagdahn et al 2003). The fracture strengths of polysilicon thin films with and without holes of radius 2.5 mm for two different film widths (20 and 50 mm) were measured; deviations from the classical value, C /3, were found (note that for these finite plates, C /3.23 is expected from finite element analysis for the 20-mm width, and C /3.04 for the 2838 N. M. Pugno and R. S. Ruoff 50-mm width) (Bagdahn et al 2003).…”
Section: Experiments On Polysilicon Thin Films With Holessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar experimental results are discussed in a recent paper (Bagdahn et al 2003). The fracture strengths of polysilicon thin films with and without holes of radius 2.5 mm for two different film widths (20 and 50 mm) were measured; deviations from the classical value, C /3, were found (note that for these finite plates, C /3.23 is expected from finite element analysis for the 20-mm width, and C /3.04 for the 2838 N. M. Pugno and R. S. Ruoff 50-mm width) (Bagdahn et al 2003).…”
Section: Experiments On Polysilicon Thin Films With Holessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The fracture strengths of polysilicon thin films with and without holes of radius 2.5 mm for two different film widths (20 and 50 mm) were measured; deviations from the classical value, C /3, were found (note that for these finite plates, C /3.23 is expected from finite element analysis for the 20-mm width, and C /3.04 for the 2838 N. M. Pugno and R. S. Ruoff 50-mm width) (Bagdahn et al 2003). In particular, we focus attention on the average values (the distribution of strengths follows a classical Weibull distribution) reported (Bagdahn et al 2003), and obtain a ratio for the experimental strength of the films with and without the hole of 0.54 (20-mm width) and 0.69 (50-mm width); from equation (7) (a % 2 mm, # ¼ ¼ 0) we obtain 0.56. This comparison emphasizes that at larger size scales a larger fracture quantum is expected, so that a much smaller hole would have little effect on the strength (here, a vacancy practically does not reduce the strength!…”
Section: Experiments On Polysilicon Thin Films With Holesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a final example, the roughness and grain boundary separations seen after HF immersion (Table IV and Fig. 8) are of the same order of magnitude as suggested in the literature for critical flaw sizes, i.e., 30-115 nm [11], [64]. This would be expected to influence the fracture and fatigue properties of polySi.…”
Section: Compared Tosupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The model for lateral instability of comb-drives [24] was used to obtain the numerical values of the finger overlap required to drive the comb-drive into unstable domains, as a function of the voltage across the comb-drive, and cause lateral snap-in. Using (6) and (9), the critical conditions for lateral snapping of the combdrive due to axial shock inputs in the presence of a voltage are computed and are shown in figure 10 as a continuous curve. The figure is divided into two different regimes by a vertical line corresponding to 66.96 V. The region to the right of this line is the region where the prediction curve is directly valid.…”
Section: Axial (Y-axis) Shock and Vibration Tests: Predictions And Rementioning
confidence: 99%