Fracture tooth fragment reattachment

Maitin, Nitin; Maitin, Shipra Nangalia; Rastogi, Khushboo; Bhushan, Rajarshi

doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-009183

Cited by 12 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Out of these 18-22% fractures, 28-44% are simple (enamel + dentin) and 11-15% are complex (enamel +dentin +pulp). Of these fractures, 96% involve maxillary central incisors [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reattachment of a Dehydrated Tooth Fragment Using Retentive Screws

AlQhtani¹

2020

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coronal fracture of the anterior teeth is mainly common among children and adolescents. Though diverse treatment modalities are available, tooth fragment reattachment is generally considered a viable treatment option due to simplicity, natural aesthetics, and functional success. This paper presents a case of a 10.5-year-old female patient with a fractured maxillary central incisor with a dehydrated fragment. The dehydrated fragmented part was reattached with the help of retentive holes using an adhesive bonding agent and a resin composite cement. Follow-up at 15 months showed that the tooth was vital and functional with natural aesthetics.

show abstract

“…Out of these 18-22% fractures, 28-44% are simple (enamel + dentin) and 11-15% are complex (enamel +dentin +pulp). Of these fractures, 96% involve maxillary central incisors [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Dental trauma is one of the common injuries affecting people of all ages, particularly children under the age of 18 years. Since most of the damage to the teeth happens in younger people [4], the treatment of these damages should be done in the right perspective by ensuring long-term benefits.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reattachment of a Dehydrated Tooth Fragment Using Retentive Screws

AlQhtani¹

2020

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1 Fractures of the anterior teeth are a common form of dental trauma that affects the primary and permanent teeth. 2 The incisors are most often affected (80% central incisors and 16% lateral incisors). 3 Crown fractures represent the majority of dental trauma in the permanent dentition (26%-76% of dental injuries), whereas crown-root fractures account for only 0.3%-5%.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of shear bond strengths with different bevel preparations for the reattachment of fractured fragments of maxillary central incisors

Ghoreishizadeh

Mohammadi

Rezayi

et al. 2020

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Aims: Fractures of anterior teeth are a highly prevalent form of dental trauma. Among the various treatment options, reattachment of the fractured part to the remaining tooth has a lot of advantages. The aim of this study was to compare different bevel preparation techniques when reattaching fractured fragments to maxillary central incisors. Methods: This study was performed on 52 maxillary central incisors that were randomly divided into 3 experimental groups and 1 control group. In the control group, the repair was done by attaching the fractured fragment using bonding and composite resin without any bevel preparation. In the second and third groups, the bevel preparation was done to a depth of 0.5 mm before attachment of the fragment on the palatal side of the fracture and on the labial and palatal sides, respectively. In the fourth group, after tooth preparation, a 0.5 mm composite veneer was placed on the labial surface. The amount of force needed to refracture the tooth was measured with a universal testing machine, and shear bond strength was calculated in MPa. Results: The mean and standard deviation (mean ± SD) of shear bond strengths in the control group were 81.48 ± 8.18 MPa. In the palatal bevel group, they were 97.74 ± 11.41 MPa; in the labial and palatal bevel group, 131.56 ± 9.25 MPa; and in the composite veneer group, 104.36 ± 5.50 MPa. Significant differences were observed between the groups, but there was no significant difference between the palatal bevel and composite veneer groups. Conclusions: Reattachment of the fractured fragments by all three methods increased the shear bond strength. The highest shear bond strength was obtained when both labial and palatal bevels were used.

show abstract

“…It has been shown there is 'predicted' eventual separation of the repaired tooth fragment due to the bonded junction progressively breaking down. 10 Consideration should be given to the storage condition of the fractured segments and the influence on the long-term prognosis. Collapse and dehydration of the fractured segment can be avoided by storage within sterile saline at 37 degrees Celsius.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Correction to: Dental quackery in India: an insight on malpractices and measures to tackle them

2019

Br Dent J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fracture tooth fragment reattachment

Cited by 12 publications

References 16 publications

Reattachment of a Dehydrated Tooth Fragment Using Retentive Screws

Reattachment of a Dehydrated Tooth Fragment Using Retentive Screws

Comparison of shear bond strengths with different bevel preparations for the reattachment of fractured fragments of maxillary central incisors

Correction to: Dental quackery in India: an insight on malpractices and measures to tackle them

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About