1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(97)00250-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture toughness determination for a beryllium-bearing bulk metallic glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
82
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
5
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample was then cycled in torsion (0.05°/second under rotational control) to surface shear stresses of nominally 1000 MPa. The shear modulus was determined to be 31 GPa, in close agreement with the previously reported value of 34 GPa for the same alloy [2]. No corrections for the finite torsional stiffness of the machine were performed in order to determine the shear modulus of the material, indicating that the machine is exceptionally stiff in torsion and meets the stability condition expressed in Equation 20.…”
Section: Ratcheting Of Ti-6al-4vsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sample was then cycled in torsion (0.05°/second under rotational control) to surface shear stresses of nominally 1000 MPa. The shear modulus was determined to be 31 GPa, in close agreement with the previously reported value of 34 GPa for the same alloy [2]. No corrections for the finite torsional stiffness of the machine were performed in order to determine the shear modulus of the material, indicating that the machine is exceptionally stiff in torsion and meets the stability condition expressed in Equation 20.…”
Section: Ratcheting Of Ti-6al-4vsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Cylindrical dogbone specimens with radii of 1.5 mm and gage lengths of 20 mm were electrode discharge machined (using low power and water cooling to prevent crystallization) from cast rods (12.5 mm diameter) provided by Liquid Metal Technologies, Inc. A uniaxial tension stress of 920 MPa was imposed and maintained constant under load control while the sample was cycled in shear. As with the titanium samples, this stress is nominally half of the tensile yield strength (1.9 GPa for Vitreloy 1) [2]. The sample was then cycled in torsion (0.05°/second under rotational control) to surface shear stresses of nominally 1000 MPa.…”
Section: Ratcheting Of Ti-6al-4vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amorphous materials have a variety of advantages such as large elastic limit, wear resistance and random packing of atoms. This class of materials has many promising properties, e.g., extremely high strength and hardness combined with relatively high fracture toughness, as well as good wear and corrosion resistance [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Therefore, porous amorphous materials combined with materials have many advantages [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many toughness measurements on BMG materials reported in the literature [11][12][13][14][15] are inaccurate due to problems of inappropriate measurement techniques ͑e.g., the area under a compression stress/strain curve͒, absence of sharp stress concentrators ͑e.g., using a relatively blunt notch rather than a fatigue precrack͒ and insufficient test-sample size. Moreover, while single-value measurements, such as K Ic , properly define the toughness of nominally brittle materials, they can be insufficient for alloys displaying extensive plastic deformation and subcritical cracking, as can occur in many BMG composites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%