“…Because of these aspects it is important to investigate the interlaminar toughness of composites at both static and cyclic loading. A part of the numerous publications in the field of quasistatic interlaminar crack propagation tests dealt with the effect of test parameters (for example: test speed [1]), laminate layup structure [2][3][4][5][6], others have characterized the effect of fillers/reinforcing materials on the fracture toughness (for example: carbon nanofiber/carbon fiber in epoxy [7,8], glass fiber in unsaturated polyester [9], carbon nanotube/carbon fiber in epoxy [10], fluoride functionalized carbon nanotubes/carbon fibers in epoxy [11], amine functionalized carbon nanotubes/glass fibers in epoxy [12], carbon nanotubes grown radially from vapor on the surface of carbon fiber in epoxy [13], vapor grown carbon fibers/carbon fibers in epoxy [14], clay nanoparticles/carbon fibers in epoxy [15][16][17], halloysite nanotubes/carbon fibers in epoxy [18]). All of the papers utilizing nanoparti-cle filling report increases from some to 300% in interlaminar fracture properties (for example: G IC or G IIC ).…”