2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-006-0179-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture toughness of the lean duplex stainless steel LDX 2101

Abstract: Fracture toughness testing was performed on the recently developed lean duplex stainless steel LDX 2101 (EN 1.4162, UNS S32101). The results were evaluated by master curve analysis, including deriving a reference temperature. The master curve approach, originally developed for ferritic steels, has been used successfully. The reference temperature corresponds to a fracture toughness of 100 MPa ffiffiffiffi m p , which characterizes the onset of cleavage cracking at elastic or elastic-plastic instabilities. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported material parameters are the Young's modulus E, the 0.2% and 1% proof stresses σ 0.2 and σ 1.0 , respectively, the ultimate tensile stress σ u , the plastic strain at fracture ε f (based on elongation over the standard gauge length A 65 . 5 , where A is the cross-sectional area of the coupon), and the strain hardening exponents n and n ' 0.2,1.0 used in the compound Ramberg-Osgood material model [10][11][12][13], which is a two-stage version of the basic Ramberg-Osgood model [14,15]. The key minimum specified material properties for grade EN 1.4162 stainless steel cold-rolled strip, as defined in [16], and included in EN 10088-4 [2], are as follows: σ 0.2 =530 N/mm 2 , σ u =700-900 N/mm 2 , ε f =30% (over a gauge length A 65 .…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reported material parameters are the Young's modulus E, the 0.2% and 1% proof stresses σ 0.2 and σ 1.0 , respectively, the ultimate tensile stress σ u , the plastic strain at fracture ε f (based on elongation over the standard gauge length A 65 . 5 , where A is the cross-sectional area of the coupon), and the strain hardening exponents n and n ' 0.2,1.0 used in the compound Ramberg-Osgood material model [10][11][12][13], which is a two-stage version of the basic Ramberg-Osgood model [14,15]. The key minimum specified material properties for grade EN 1.4162 stainless steel cold-rolled strip, as defined in [16], and included in EN 10088-4 [2], are as follows: σ 0.2 =530 N/mm 2 , σ u =700-900 N/mm 2 , ε f =30% (over a gauge length A 65 .…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within construction, although austenitic stainless steels are the most widely specified, their strengths are often not fully utilised; a recently developed 'lean duplex' stainless steel, containing approximately 1.5% nickel, may offer a more appropriate balance of properties for structural applications. The particular grade considered in this study is EN 1.4162, which is generally less expensive and possesses higher strength than the familiar austenitics, while still retaining good corrosion resistance and high temperature properties [3], together with adequate weldability [4] and fracture toughness [5]. Examples of the use of lean duplex stainless steel in construction have already emerged [6], including footbridges in FÖrde, Norway and Siena, Italy; the latter is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fracture toughness, 3) precipitation of nitrides with heat treatment, 4) and improvement of mechanical properties using stressinduced martensitic transformation of the γ phase 5,6) have been reported for lean duplex stainless steels. Herrera et al 5) investigated duplex stainless steel with α and γ volume fractions of 37% and 63%, respectively, from a Fe-19.9Cr-0.42Ni-0.16N-4.79Mn-0.11C-0.46Cu-0.35Si steel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A recently developed grade of stainless steel, known as lean duplex (EN 1.4162), has a far lower nickel content, around 1.5% [1], and hence considerably reduced cost. Despite the low nickel content, it possesses higher strength than austenitic stainless steel, along with good corrosion resistance and high temperature properties, and adequate weldability and fracture toughness [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%