2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03582-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractured aluminum nasopharyngeal swab during drive-through testing for COVID-19: radiographic detection of a retained foreign body

Abstract: The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has increased the need for safe and efficient testing as a key containment strategy. Drive-through testing with nasopharyngeal swab has been implemented in many places in the USA as it allows for expeditious testing of large numbers of patients, limits healthcare workers' risk of exposure, and minimizes the use of personal protective equipment. We present a case where the aluminum shaft of the nasopharyngeal swab fractured during specimen collection at a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the aforementioned Treviso Hospital study, there were 3 instances of epistaxis requiring nasal packing, 2 broken swabs that lodged into the nasal cavity, prompting intervention by otolaryngologists, and 1 case of a septal abscess following nasopharyngeal swabbing [ 19 ]. In a review of the literature regarding other major complications of nasopharyngeal swabs, there were at least 7 other instances in which the nasopharyngeal swab shaft broke within the nasal cavity of the patient, all of which required endoscopy for retrieval [ [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] ]. Three of these instances involved the shaft fragment inserting inferior to the inferior nasal turbinate, while two instances involved a fragment eventually being found in the gastric cavity [ [21] , [22] , [23] , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the aforementioned Treviso Hospital study, there were 3 instances of epistaxis requiring nasal packing, 2 broken swabs that lodged into the nasal cavity, prompting intervention by otolaryngologists, and 1 case of a septal abscess following nasopharyngeal swabbing [ 19 ]. In a review of the literature regarding other major complications of nasopharyngeal swabs, there were at least 7 other instances in which the nasopharyngeal swab shaft broke within the nasal cavity of the patient, all of which required endoscopy for retrieval [ [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] ]. Three of these instances involved the shaft fragment inserting inferior to the inferior nasal turbinate, while two instances involved a fragment eventually being found in the gastric cavity [ [21] , [22] , [23] , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review of the literature regarding other major complications of nasopharyngeal swabs, there were at least 7 other instances in which the nasopharyngeal swab shaft broke within the nasal cavity of the patient, all of which required endoscopy for retrieval [ [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] ]. Three of these instances involved the shaft fragment inserting inferior to the inferior nasal turbinate, while two instances involved a fragment eventually being found in the gastric cavity [ [21] , [22] , [23] , 26 ]. In a study on 96 volunteers with both commercial swabs and 3D-printed swabs, the most common complications of commercial swab sampling included headache (5.2%), rhinorrhea (5.2%), and epistaxis (8.3%); however, one participant eventually had to be hospitalized for recurrent episodic bleeding after a commercial swab test [ 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods of sampling include sputum samples, bronchoalveolar lavage, or a bronchoscopic brush biopsy with a variable degree of accuracy [ 7 ]. One of the serious reported complications of taking a swab is that of the swab stick breaking, resulting in the broken part getting stuck as a foreign body in the nasopharynx or the lower respiratory tracts [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the nasopharyngeal swab may be the most proper method for taken the sample. The complication of nasopharyngeal procedure is swab fracture which considered as a foreign body that result in obstruction or infection of lower respiratory airway (Azar et al, 2020) or the nasal roof penetration (Miller et al, 2020) leading to meningitis or either temporally or permanent Anosmia (loss of smell) due to olfactory nerve injury.…”
Section: Anatomical Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%