SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2010 2010
DOI: 10.1190/1.3513443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractures Detection Using Multi‐Azimuth Diffractions Focusing Measure: Is it Feasible?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their method operates on post-stack data, as they show that diffractions are highly sensitive to migration velocity, even in the zero-offset case. Al-Dajani and Fomel (2010) have successfully demonstrated zero-offset diffraction image focusing as a fracture detection attribute on azimuth-sectored 3D field data. Our proposed method uses multi-azimuth image focusing primarily as a velocity analysis criterion, but kurtosis could also be used as an image attribute.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their method operates on post-stack data, as they show that diffractions are highly sensitive to migration velocity, even in the zero-offset case. Al-Dajani and Fomel (2010) have successfully demonstrated zero-offset diffraction image focusing as a fracture detection attribute on azimuth-sectored 3D field data. Our proposed method uses multi-azimuth image focusing primarily as a velocity analysis criterion, but kurtosis could also be used as an image attribute.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our proposed method uses multi-azimuth image focusing primarily as a velocity analysis criterion, but kurtosis could also be used as an image attribute. In cases where subsurface fractures cause azimuthal anisotropy, kurtosis as an attribute may be indicative of fracture intensity (Al-Dajani and Fomel, 2010). By applying velocity continuation to 3D diffraction imaging, one may be able to estimate both the orientation and the intensity of fractures from the resulting anisotropic velocity model and maximum kurtosis volumes, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our proposed method uses multiazimuth image focusing primarily as a velocity analysis criterion, but kurtosis could also be used as an image attribute. In cases where subsurface fractures cause azimuthal anisotropy, kurtosis as an attribute may be indicative of fracture intensity [38]. By applying velocity continuation to 3D diffraction imaging, one may be able to estimate both the orientation and the intensity of fractures from the resulting anisotropic velocity model and maximum kurtosis volumes, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their method operates on post-stack data, as they show that diffractions are highly sensitive to migration velocity, even in the zero-offset case. Al-Dajani and Fomel [38] have successfully demonstrated zero-offset diffraction image focusing as a fracture detection attribute on azimuth-sectored 3D field data. Our proposed method uses multiazimuth image focusing primarily as a velocity analysis criterion, but kurtosis could also be used as an image attribute.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches and applications have been developed for diffraction imaging. The key applications of diffractions are for detections of faults and fractures (Khaidukov et al, 2004;Cheng and Hilterman, 2007;Al-Dajani and Fomel, 2010;Zhu and Wu, 2010) and migration velocity analysis (Harlan et al, 1984;Soellner, and Yang, 2002;Sava et al, 2005;Fomel et al, 2007;Landa and Fomel, 2008;Reshef and Landa, 2009 Currently, all the reported examples are petroleum exploration oriented, where targets are relatively deep and the seismic frequencies are relatively low around 10 -60 Hz. In this paper, we apply the diffraction imaging techniques to enhance the detectability of small faults for coal seismic environments and demonstrate the feasibility of a new fault imaging method with numerical examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%