1935
DOI: 10.1056/nejm193505162122003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractures of the Head and Neck of Radius — Separation of Upper Radial Epiphysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

1954
1954
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fractures of the radial head are among the most common elbow fractures in adults [8] and accounts for 15% to 45% of injuries around elbow joint [9,10]. Since 1954, when Mason [11] first provided classification of radial head fractures, the management is still controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractures of the radial head are among the most common elbow fractures in adults [8] and accounts for 15% to 45% of injuries around elbow joint [9,10]. Since 1954, when Mason [11] first provided classification of radial head fractures, the management is still controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractures of the radial head and neck are not uncommon injuries accounting for 1.7-5.4% of all adult fractures with a female preponderance of 2 : 1 (Morrey, 1993). They account for approximately 20% of all elbow trauma (McKee and Jupiter, 1998), although figures quoted range from 17% to 44% (Jones, 1935;Murray, 1939). Eighty-five percent of these injuries occur in adults aged 20-60 years, with a mean age of 30-40 years (Morrey, 2000).…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the prognosis of most isolated radial head fractures is good [1], in 1935, Jones [2] had already stated that: ‘The fracture of the head of the radius is a serious injury, and whilst the prognosis is good for recovery of a useful elbow, rarely it is a normal elbow’. Complications such as loss of elbow motion or persistent elbow pain are frequently encountered [3][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%