Fractures of the mandibular condyle – Open versus closed – A treatment dilemma

Shiju, Muhammed; Rastogi, Sanjay; Gupta, Prashant; Kukreja, Sumedha; Thomas, Roy; Bhugra, Amit Kumar; Reddy, Mahendra Parvatha; Choudhury, Rupshikha

doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2015.01.012

Cited by 72 publications

(83 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A prospective one-year study 14 Silvennoinen et al 5 1994 Analysis of possible factors leading to problems after nonsurgical treatment of condylar fractures 15 Smets et al 11 2003 Non-surgical treatment of condylar fractures in adults: a retrospective analysis 16 Yamamoto et al 32 2004…”

Section: Prospective Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Closed treatment of unilateral mandibular condyle fractures in adults: a systematic review

Rozeboom

Dubois

Bos

et al. 2017

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Prospective Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, none of these studies has focused on the outcomes of different closed treatment procedures. 15,16 Due to the substantial diversity of definitions of closed treatment, a uniform protocol/guideline for closed treatment is required. Most closed therapy interventions require expert experience.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Closed treatment of unilateral mandibular condyle fractures in adults: a systematic review

Rozeboom

Dubois

Bos

et al. 2017

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…How to optimally treat a fracture of the mandibular condyle is one of the most challenging controversies in maxillofacial trauma care. Studies examining the most appropriate treatment modality for condylar fractures are ongoing . Treatment options for fractures of the mandibular condyle consist of either closed treatment (ie, a period of maxillomandibular fixation; MMF) or open treatment (ie, open reduction with internal fixation; ORIF) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is masticatory performance affected after a unilateral condylar fracture? A cross‐sectional study

Rozeboom

Speksnijder

Dubois

et al. 2018

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Većina autora se slaže po pitanju indikacija za primenu konzervativnog i hirurškog lečenja preloma kondilarnog nastavka. Handšel, Borman, Rozebom (Rozeboom), Elis, Šiju (Shiju), Ekelt (Eckelt) i Konstantinović u svojim studijama daju prednost hiruškom lečenju ovog preloma, dok Suhas, Santler i Nalić favorizuju konzervativno lečenje (1,8,12,19,26,28,29,30,31,32,33). Studija sprovedena nad dve grupe pacijenata, od kojih je prva lečena konzervativno, a druga hirurški (endoskopski vođenim intraoralnim pristupom), pokazuje da su obe vrste lečenja dale zadovoljavajuće rezultate u terapiji preloma kondilarnog nastavka sa dislokacijom.…”

Section: Diskusijaunclassified

Frequency and approaches in treatment of fractured condylar processes in population of South East Serbia for the period from 2011 to 2017

Milosavljević¹,

Ranđelović²,

Pesic³

2018

Medicinski podmladak

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The condyloid process or condylar process (processus condylaris) is the second, more posterior process on the mandible, which takes part in the formation of the temporomandibular joint. Fractures of the condyloid process constitute 25% to 35% of all fractures of the mandible. They rarely occur isolated, whereas they are more often associated with fractures of other localizations on the mandible. Aim: This paper aims at determining the frequency of the fracture of the condyloid process of the mandible in relation to fractures of other localizations; the mechanisms of injury occurrence; as well as the representation of individual surgical procedures within the treatment. Material and Methods: The data obtained from the medical documentation of the Department for Maxillofacial Surgery, the Dentistry Clinic of Niš were analyzed using clinical retrospective study in the period from January 2011 to December 2017. Results: The analysis of the medical documentation established that 343 patients having mandible fractures were treated at the Dentistry Clinic of Niš, at the Maxillofacial Surgery Department in the aforementioned period, out of which 85 patients had a fracture of the condyle and were treated with surgery, while 13 were treated conservatively. Conclusion: It was stated that the mandible fracture most frequently lead to the occurrence of fracture of its condyloid process. Most frequently it occurs with men at the age of 21-40 as the consequence of physical violence.

show abstract

Fractures of the mandibular condyle – Open versus closed – A treatment dilemma

Cited by 72 publications

References 20 publications

Closed treatment of unilateral mandibular condyle fractures in adults: a systematic review

Closed treatment of unilateral mandibular condyle fractures in adults: a systematic review

Is masticatory performance affected after a unilateral condylar fracture? A cross‐sectional study

Frequency and approaches in treatment of fractured condylar processes in population of South East Serbia for the period from 2011 to 2017

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About