1998
DOI: 10.2118/51187-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracturing, Frac Packing, and Formation Failure Control: Can Screenless Completions Prevent Sand Production?

Abstract: This paper (SPE 51187) was revised for publication from paper SPE 36457, first presented at the 1996 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Denver, 6-9 October. Original manuscript received for review 23 October 1996. Revised manuscript received 21 May 1997. Paper peer approved 9 March 1998. Summary Some successful results have been reported for screenless frac-packing methods; however, no scientific guidelines were given regarding the conditi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the sand production is indeed proportional to the flow rate under the Eqn ; that is, if we were to calibrate the model for a certain reference value of Q , then we can predict sand production for other values of the flow rate. In Papamichos et al , it is argued that this proportionality is supported (very) approximately by experiment. Nonetheless, considering the data of Papamichos et al in scaled time t / τ suggests that this is too approximate and possibly not entirely correct, in the sense that different Q curves (for the same external stress) do not visibly collapse to each other at an acceptable level.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Model Prediction and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the sand production is indeed proportional to the flow rate under the Eqn ; that is, if we were to calibrate the model for a certain reference value of Q , then we can predict sand production for other values of the flow rate. In Papamichos et al , it is argued that this proportionality is supported (very) approximately by experiment. Nonetheless, considering the data of Papamichos et al in scaled time t / τ suggests that this is too approximate and possibly not entirely correct, in the sense that different Q curves (for the same external stress) do not visibly collapse to each other at an acceptable level.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Model Prediction and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The availability of models to predict the onset and quantity of sand produced is very crucial. There is a vast literature in the modelling of erosion phenomena attempting to capture the failure and onset of sanding . Sanding criteria that are routinely used in the models for predictions are usually based on shear, tensile failure critical pressure gradient , critical plastic deformation and erosion based criteria .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second stage, after the end is de-sanded, the sand carrying fluid is pumped to increase the fracture width and finally improve the fracture conductivity (Yushi et al, 2021b). The tip screening out process is gradually formed on the basis of hydraulic fracturing technology, which artificially controls the fracture propagation and greatly increases the width of the fracture to achieve the purpose of both increasing production and sand control (Desroches and Thiercelin, 1993;Ortega L et al, 1996;Morita N et al, 1998). In unconsolidated sandstone reservoirs with high permeability, increasing fracture conductivity is more beneficial to increase production than increasing fracture length.…”
Section: Tip Screening Out Sand Control Fracturing and Filling Techno...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morita et al 3 reported a sand production analysis on a mature gas field. Their model only predicts onset of sand production and not the sanding rate.…”
Section: Spe 80448mentioning
confidence: 99%