2020
DOI: 10.1787/65d5cb9c-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fragility and Agenda 2030

Abstract: This document, as well as any data and any map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that since debt servicing is not sectorally allocated, a proportion of the debt service seen in Figure 2.5 could be used to repay loans for education and water, sanitation and hygiene infrastructure, for example, and would not be recorded against these sectoral classifications. Yet, even accounting for this, far less is spent on social safety nets in fragile contexts than in other developing contexts -just one-fifth as much (USD 35.5 versus USD 161 per capita 4 ), according to data from the World Bank Atlas of Social Protection Indicators of Resilience and Equity, or ASPIRE (World Bank, 2020 [56]). 5 Note: This figure shows the arithmetic mean across all contexts for which data are available for a given year and expenditure type.…”
Section: Figure 24 Governments In Fragile Contexts Spend Their Finamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It should be noted that since debt servicing is not sectorally allocated, a proportion of the debt service seen in Figure 2.5 could be used to repay loans for education and water, sanitation and hygiene infrastructure, for example, and would not be recorded against these sectoral classifications. Yet, even accounting for this, far less is spent on social safety nets in fragile contexts than in other developing contexts -just one-fifth as much (USD 35.5 versus USD 161 per capita 4 ), according to data from the World Bank Atlas of Social Protection Indicators of Resilience and Equity, or ASPIRE (World Bank, 2020 [56]). 5 Note: This figure shows the arithmetic mean across all contexts for which data are available for a given year and expenditure type.…”
Section: Figure 24 Governments In Fragile Contexts Spend Their Finamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are many long-term positive benefits from reducing at-the-border and behind-the-border barriers to trade, the entry into force of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement could also bring a second, trade-tax based fiscal shock to be managed in the short term (OECD/ATAF/AUC, 2019[47]; World Bank, 2020[133]). 4. These ASPIRE figures include both donor financing and financing provided by governments 5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that since debt servicing is not sectorally allocated, a proportion of the debt service seen in Figure 2.5 could be used to repay loans for education and water, sanitation and hygiene infrastructure, for example, and would not be recorded against these sectoral classifications. Yet, even accounting for this, far less is spent on social safety nets in fragile contexts than in other developing contexts -just one-fifth as much (USD 35.5 versus USD 161 per capita 4 ), according to data from the World Bank Atlas of Social Protection Indicators of Resilience and Equity, or ASPIRE (World Bank, 2020 [56]). 5…”
Section: Figure 24 Governments In Fragile Contexts Spend Their Financial Resources In Very Different Waysmentioning
confidence: 99%