2020
DOI: 10.1002/ange.202011295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fragment‐Bindung an die Kinase‐Scharnier‐Region: Wenn Ladungsverteilung und lokale pKa‐Verschiebungen etablierte Bioisosterie‐Konzepte fehlleiten

Abstract: Die medizinisch-chemische Optimierung folgt einer Strategie, funktionelle Gruppen zu ersetzen und grçßere Substituenten an ein vielversprechendes Leitstrukturgerüst anzufügen. Wohl etablierte Bioisosterie-Regeln werden berücksichtigt, dennoch ist es schwierig abzuschätzen, ob die durchgeführten Modifikationen auch wirklich den Anforderungen einer Bindestelle gerecht werden. Die Elektronendichteverteilung und die pK a-Werte der Liganden werden moduliert und beeinflussen so Protonierungszustände und Bioverfügbar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other follow-up compounds in the presented EP campaign did not maintain the anticipated binding pose. In fact, a change of binding mode upon chemical variation is not uncommon, and adding substitutions that enable new but competing interactions is reportedly a major cause of this (Malhotra & Karanicolas, 2017;Oebbeke et al, 2021). In the case of FU 5 -4, for example, the changed binding pose could supposedly have been anticipated or predicted, as interactions of the guanidine moiety with the catalytic dyad are very plausible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other follow-up compounds in the presented EP campaign did not maintain the anticipated binding pose. In fact, a change of binding mode upon chemical variation is not uncommon, and adding substitutions that enable new but competing interactions is reportedly a major cause of this (Malhotra & Karanicolas, 2017;Oebbeke et al, 2021). In the case of FU 5 -4, for example, the changed binding pose could supposedly have been anticipated or predicted, as interactions of the guanidine moiety with the catalytic dyad are very plausible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fortunate cases, suitable analogs can be further evaluated by structure-based computational methods, in particular by molecular docking (Yuriev & Ramsland, 2013). However, the identification of a promising scaffold with the correct binding pose among a large variety of possibilities via docking still remains a challenging problem, especially for molecules as small as fragments that form only a few interactions and can easily alter their binding poses upon modulation of their substitution patterns (Lamoree & Hubbard, 2017;Oebbeke et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%