1987
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.59.2720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fragment Flow in Nuclear Collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
58
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the approach of Kampert [23] and Doss et al [26], we studied the dimensionless quantity p, / I p , . Figure 12(a) shows the strong correlation of hydrodynamic flow which is preserved by heavier fragments.…”
Section: E Azimuthal Angular Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the approach of Kampert [23] and Doss et al [26], we studied the dimensionless quantity p, / I p , . Figure 12(a) shows the strong correlation of hydrodynamic flow which is preserved by heavier fragments.…”
Section: E Azimuthal Angular Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be emphasized that the midrapidity data were not included in the Gaussian fit. The shape of the distribution appears different than that observed in heavy-ion collisions at lower beam momenta [ 18,19], where the flow strength increases from zero at midrapidity linearly to the peaks at target and projectile rapidity. In 158 AGeV Pb + Pb collisions however, the peaks are Gaussian and only the tails extend to midrapidity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In this case the ratio of the relative width and the gap between the Gaussian peaks would be smaller so that a linear behaviour is found at midrapidity. This suspicion was confirmed by a good agreement with a Gaussian fit for the proton data from 200 AMeV Au + Au collisions provided by the Plastic Ball collaboration [ 18]. Hence for a complete description of the rapidity distribution of the collective flow F the formerly used slope at midrapidity (dF/dy| y=0 ) is not sufficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Thus, a meaningful comparison between experimental flow observables and those predicted by the theory should be made on the basis of coalescence invariant quantities including the contributions of all emitted particles. This requires in particular the inclusion of intermediate mass fragments (IMF, Z ≥ 3) which are known to carry larger amount of flow than do lighter particles [29][30][31][32] and which constitutes a non negligeable fraction of the total mass of the system even at incident energies of a few hundred A MeV [26,[32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%