1988
DOI: 10.1063/1.455034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fragmentation of molecular adsorbates by electron and ion bombardment: Methoxy chemistry on Al(111)

Abstract: (High resolution) electron energy loss spectroscopy [(HR)EELS] has been used successfully to provide direct spectroscopic evidence regarding details of the molecular fragmentation of methoxy (CH3O) on Al(111) caused by energetic electron and ion beams. Chemisorbed methoxy on Al(111) is produced by heating of adsorbed CH3OH. Irradiation of CH3O(a) by either energetic (∼300 eV) electrons or Ar+ ions results in C–O and C–H bond scission with simultaneous formation of Al–O and Al–C bonds. During electron stimulate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no direct evidence to determine whether the methyl moiety desorbs as methyl radical, methyl cation, ethane, or other species, although desorption of a methyl radical or methyl cation is suggested as described below. It is interesting to note that Yates et al studied electron-beam-induced surface chemistry for methoxy(CH 3 O)/Al(111), which is an analogue to the present system, and found the preferential rupture of C−O bonds . Further, cross sections for desorption of neutral methoxy radicals and H + ions have been found to be 2 and 5 orders of magnitude, respectively, smaller than that for the C−O bond cleavage…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is no direct evidence to determine whether the methyl moiety desorbs as methyl radical, methyl cation, ethane, or other species, although desorption of a methyl radical or methyl cation is suggested as described below. It is interesting to note that Yates et al studied electron-beam-induced surface chemistry for methoxy(CH 3 O)/Al(111), which is an analogue to the present system, and found the preferential rupture of C−O bonds . Further, cross sections for desorption of neutral methoxy radicals and H + ions have been found to be 2 and 5 orders of magnitude, respectively, smaller than that for the C−O bond cleavage…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The typical C−C bond energy of alkyl chains is almost 2 times larger than those for the Au−S and the S−C bonds at the CH 3 S/Au(111) interface. , However, since the ESD processes involve electronically excited states induced by electron irradiation, the cross section for each channel cannot be simply related to the bond strength in the ground state. Furthermore, the quenching of such electronically excited states due to the metal substrate is an important factor to the cross section and proximity of the excited bond to the metal surface strongly reduces the cross section ,, the C−C bonds are less influenced by the quenching compared to the Au−S and S−C bonds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation results are qualitatively compared with reported x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy ͑XPS͒ and electron energy-loss spectroscopy ͑EELS͒ experiments of similar molecules. 24,25 The calculations suggest new decomposition species that were not observed in a previous DFT study of static decomposition. 37 To explore the effect of initial molecular orientation on decomposition, ancillary calculations were conducted in which each molecule was either aligned with its carbon backbone parallel to Al͑111͒ or rotated such that its functional group was pointing away from Al͑111͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Table 1 Methoxy on the Al-terminated (100) plane of NiAl exhibits a ν(M-O) mode at 640 cm -1 , 21 close to the position of the same mode of methoxy adsorbed on monometallic Al (650 cm -1 ). 7 The frequency of this mode is significantly lower (530 cm -1 ) for methoxy adsorbed on the (110) plane 32a that is capped by a well-ordered Ni and Al (50% each component) surface layer. As mentioned in the Introduction, the structure of the (111) plane is more complex, since it is thought to be comprised of 1 × 1 domains that are individually terminated by Al and Ni.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%