2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frame by Frame Analysis of Glottic Insufficiency Using Laryngovideostroboscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above noted studies revealed significant association between paresis and abnormalities of VF configuration (thin, shorter, and bowed VF). Frame‐by‐frame analysis of glottic insufficiency suggested that subjects with paresis typically displayed an open‐phase–dominant pattern. The correlation between paresis and mucosal wave anomalies was examined independently in a 2011 study .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above noted studies revealed significant association between paresis and abnormalities of VF configuration (thin, shorter, and bowed VF). Frame‐by‐frame analysis of glottic insufficiency suggested that subjects with paresis typically displayed an open‐phase–dominant pattern. The correlation between paresis and mucosal wave anomalies was examined independently in a 2011 study .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, assessing the phase closure using a frame by frame analysis technique has been reported as beneficial in determining the degree of glottal insufficiency in patients with vocal fold atrophy and vocal fold paresis. 15 Perhaps for similar reasons, VLS has been found to be useful in some patients with vocal fold paralysis. 5 Despite the perceived benefit in this clinical scenario, the exact motivation for the VLS and how and for which patients with vocal fold paralysis and paresis VLS was beneficial remain important unknowns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data were collected and reviewed in compliance with approval from the University of Colorado Hospital Multiple Institutional Review Board. After review, 23 patients met the inclusion criteria of a documented chronic cough, with symptoms lasting more than 8 weeks and a diagnosis of glottic insufficiency—defined as a glottic vibratory pattern with 40% or less of frames in the closed phase at comfortable pitch and loudness (diagnosed using frame‐by‐frame analysis) . Exclusionary criteria included lack of cough complaints; incomplete data sets; vocal fold immobility; vocal fold lesions; cough related to dysphagia; active smoking status at the time of visit; or documented comorbid pulmonary conditions that might contribute to cough symptoms including chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder; reflux symptoms including heartburn, belching, and regurgitation; allergies; asthma; and sinusitis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After review, 23 patients met the inclusion criteria of a documented chronic cough, with symptoms lasting more than 8 weeks and a diagnosis of glottic insufficiency-defined as a glottic vibratory pattern with 40% or less of frames in the closed phase at comfortable pitch and loudness (diagnosed using frame-by-frame analysis). 11 Exclusionary criteria included lack of cough complaints; incomplete data sets; vocal fold immobility; vocal fold lesions; cough related to dysphagia; active smoking status at the time of visit; or documented comorbid pulmonary conditions that might contribute to cough symptoms including chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder; reflux symptoms including heartburn, belching, and regurgitation; allergies; asthma; and sinusitis. Data collected from this chart review included age; gender; past medical history including laryngopharyngeal reflux/GERD, allergic rhinitis, or chronic sinusitis; amount of time the symptoms were present; previous treatments; pre-and post-Cough Severity Index (CSI) scores; and patient report of percent change in cough symptoms at 1-month postinjection visit obtained and documented by the laryngologist.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%